> > A later patch shows
> > how useful this will be.
>
> Instead of all of the above, how about being more direct, i.e. e.g.
ok.
> Conceptually, this allows string_list_clear() to be implemented in
> terms of this function, i.e.
>
> string_list_clear(struct string_list *list, int free_u
Stefan Beller writes:
> A string list can be used as a stack, but should we?
verb missing. "We can use a string list as ..., but should we?" is
readable. "A string list can be ..., but should it be?" also is.
> A later patch shows
> how useful this will be.
Instead of all of the above, how a
A string list can be used as a stack, but should we? A later patch shows
how useful this will be.
In an earlier iteration of this patch it was suggested to return the last
element or NULL (if empty), to enable a pattern of
while ((item = string_list_pop(&list))
work_on(item);
But it tu
3 matches
Mail list logo
