Re: [PATCH 00/38] Virtualization of the refs API

2016-07-13 Thread Michael Haggerty
On 07/10/2016 05:09 PM, Duy Nguyen wrote: > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 11:03 PM, Michael Haggerty > wrote: >> Since the that ref-iterator [1] changes seem to have gotten a positive >> reception, let's try to keep up the momentum. I hope I'm not >> overloading the review pipeline... >> >> I think all

Re: [PATCH 00/38] Virtualization of the refs API

2016-07-10 Thread Duy Nguyen
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 11:03 PM, Michael Haggerty wrote: > Since the that ref-iterator [1] changes seem to have gotten a positive > reception, let's try to keep up the momentum. I hope I'm not > overloading the review pipeline... > > I think all of the groundwork is in place now to virtualize the

[PATCH 00/38] Virtualization of the refs API

2016-06-03 Thread Michael Haggerty
Since the that ref-iterator [1] changes seem to have gotten a positive reception, let's try to keep up the momentum. I hope I'm not overloading the review pipeline... I think all of the groundwork is in place now to virtualize the refs API. This will open the way to storing refs in ways other than