On 06/18/2013 08:13 PM, Ramsay Jones wrote:
> Michael Haggerty wrote:
>> On 06/15/2013 10:13 PM, Ramsay Jones wrote:
>>> Now, turning to the new code, t3211-peel-ref.sh test #7 now works, but
>>> test #8 still fails...
>
> [ ... ]
>
>> It should be impossible, because the current proc
Michael Haggerty wrote:
> Thanks for all of the information.
>
> On 06/15/2013 10:13 PM, Ramsay Jones wrote:
>> Michael Haggerty wrote:
>>> *This patch series must be built on top of mh/reflife.*
[ ... ]
>> You may be wondering why clear_packed_ref_cache() is called? Well, that
>> is because sta
Thanks for all of the information.
On 06/15/2013 10:13 PM, Ramsay Jones wrote:
> Michael Haggerty wrote:
>> *This patch series must be built on top of mh/reflife.*
>>
>
> [...]
>
>> The other problem was that the for_each_ref() functions will die if
>> the ref cache that they are iterating over
Michael Haggerty wrote:
> *This patch series must be built on top of mh/reflife.*
>
[...]
> The other problem was that the for_each_ref() functions will die if
> the ref cache that they are iterating over is freed out from under
> them. This problem is solved by using reference counts to avoid
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 11:48:20PM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> *This patch series must be built on top of mh/reflife.*
Applying on top of what Junio has in mh/reflife seems to create
conflicts at the first patch. I didn't look into it, though, but just
read the patches and looked at the pack
*This patch series must be built on top of mh/reflife.*
This patch series fixes some races reading loose and packed refs.
Most of the problems, and some of the solutions, were pointed out by
Jeff King [1] but some other work was necessary to prevent his fixes
from causing problems elsewhere.
The
6 matches
Mail list logo