On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 1:25 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Even if you think "the right way" is to add to the iterators, I
> suspect that we can still do incremental fixes? I agree with the
> order of importance Michael listed in his message (i.e. the index
> and the HEAD first, and then other per-w
Junio C Hamano writes:
> I do not recall seeing that. I however deliberately ignored another
> statement because I thought it enough to answer, which was:
Oops. "because I didn't think I thought it enough to answer" was
what I meant.
Duy Nguyen writes:
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 3:21 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Johannes Schindelin writes:
>>
>>> Also, the more important reply was Peff's reply that suggested that the
>>> proposed fix was incomplete, as it misses --unpack-unreachable:
>>> https://public-inbox.org/git/201606011
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 3:21 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin writes:
>
>> Also, the more important reply was Peff's reply that suggested that the
>> proposed fix was incomplete, as it misses --unpack-unreachable:
>> https://public-inbox.org/git/20160601160143.ga9...@sigill.intra.pe
Johannes Schindelin writes:
> Also, the more important reply was Peff's reply that suggested that the
> proposed fix was incomplete, as it misses --unpack-unreachable:
> https://public-inbox.org/git/20160601160143.ga9...@sigill.intra.peff.net/
While I think that --unpack-unreachable thing is a s
Hi Duy,
On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi Duy,
>
> On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Johannes Schindelin
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> > >
> > >> You meant this one [1]? There is nothing substantial si
Hi Duy,
On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Johannes Schindelin
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 4:43 PM, Johannes Schindelin
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
> Hi Duy,
>
> On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 4:43 PM, Johannes Schindelin
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Johannes Schindelin
>> >> w
Hi Duy,
On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 4:43 PM, Johannes Schindelin
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Johannes Schindelin
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
> >>
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 4:43 PM, Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
> Hi Duy,
>
> On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Johannes Schindelin
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Duy,
>> >
>> > On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
>> >
>> >> This squashes two changes from Johann
Hi Duy,
On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Johannes Schindelin
> wrote:
> > Hi Duy,
> >
> > On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
> >
> >> This squashes two changes from Johannes and Ramsay: [...]
> >
> > Sorry, I lost track of the worktree discussi
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
> Hi Duy,
>
> On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
>
>> This squashes two changes from Johannes and Ramsay: [...]
>
> Sorry, I lost track of the worktree discussions... Could you remind me
> which patch is supposed to fix my con
Hi Duy,
On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
> This squashes two changes from Johannes and Ramsay: [...]
Sorry, I lost track of the worktree discussions... Could you remind me
which patch is supposed to fix my continuous reflog corruption?
Thanks,
Dscho
This squashes two changes from Johannes and Ramsay:
diff --git a/builtin/worktree.c b/builtin/worktree.c
index 339c622e20..a1c91f1542 100644
--- a/builtin/worktree.c
+++ b/builtin/worktree.c
@@ -528,7 +528,7 @@ static int unlock_worktree(int ac, const char **av, const
char *prefix)
static void
14 matches
Mail list logo
