Jonathan Nieder writes:
> - there shouldn't be any need for the blobs to even be mentioned in
> the .pack stored locally. The .idx file maps from sha1 to offset
> within the packfile --- a special offset could mean "this is a
> missing blob".
Clever.
> - However, the list of missing blob
Hi again,
Jeff Hostetler wrote:
> In my original RFC there were comments/complaints that with
> missing blobs we lose the ability to detect corruptions. My
> proposed changes to index-pack and rev-list (and suggestions
> for other commands like fsck) just disabled those errors.
> Personally, I'm
On 5/3/2017 2:27 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Hi,
Jeff Hostetler wrote:
Missing-Blob Support
Let me offer up an alternative idea for representing
missing blobs. This is differs from both of our previous
proposals. (I don't have any code for this new proposal,
I just want
Hi,
Jonathan Tan wrote:
> The binary search to lookup a packfile offset from a .idx file
> (which involves disk reads) would take longer for all lookups (not
> just lookups for missing blobs) - I think I prefer keeping the lists
> separate, to avoid pessimizing the (likely) usual case where the
>
On 05/03/2017 09:38 AM, Jeff Hostetler wrote:
On 3/8/2017 1:50 PM, g...@jeffhostetler.com wrote:
From: Jeff Hostetler
[RFC] Partial Clone and Fetch
=
[...]
E. Unresolved Thoughts
==
*TODO* The server should optionally return (in a side-band?)
Hi,
Jeff Hostetler wrote:
> On 3/8/2017 1:50 PM, g...@jeffhostetler.com wrote:
>> [RFC] Partial Clone and Fetch
>> =
>> [...]
>> E. Unresolved Thoughts
>> ==
>>
>> *TODO* The server should optionally return (in a side-band?) a list
>> of the blobs t
On 3/8/2017 1:50 PM, g...@jeffhostetler.com wrote:
From: Jeff Hostetler
[RFC] Partial Clone and Fetch
=
[...]
E. Unresolved Thoughts
==
*TODO* The server should optionally return (in a side-band?) a list
of the blobs that it omitted from the p
On 3/22/2017 12:21 PM, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi Kostis,
On Wed, 22 Mar 2017, ankostis wrote:
On 8 March 2017 at 19:50, wrote:
From: Jeff Hostetler
[RFC] Partial Clone and Fetch
=
This is a WIP RFC for a partial clone and fetch feature wherein the
client
Hi Kostis,
On Wed, 22 Mar 2017, ankostis wrote:
> On 8 March 2017 at 19:50, wrote:
> > From: Jeff Hostetler
> >
> > [RFC] Partial Clone and Fetch
> > =
> >
> > This is a WIP RFC for a partial clone and fetch feature wherein the
> > client can request that the server
Dear Jeff
I read most of the valuable references you provided
but could not find something along the lines describing inline.
On 8 March 2017 at 19:50, wrote:
> From: Jeff Hostetler
>
>
> [RFC] Partial Clone and Fetch
> =
>
> This is a WIP RFC for a partial clone a
On 3/16/2017 5:43 PM, Jeff Hostetler wrote:
On 3/9/2017 3:18 PM, Jonathan Tan wrote:
Overall, this fetch/clone approach seems reasonable to me, except
perhaps some unanswered questions (some of which are also being
discussed elsewhere):
- does the server need to tell us of missing blobs?
-
On 3/9/2017 3:18 PM, Jonathan Tan wrote:
Overall, this fetch/clone approach seems reasonable to me, except
perhaps some unanswered questions (some of which are also being
discussed elsewhere):
- does the server need to tell us of missing blobs?
- if yes, does the server need to tell us their
Overall, this fetch/clone approach seems reasonable to me, except
perhaps some unanswered questions (some of which are also being
discussed elsewhere):
- does the server need to tell us of missing blobs?
- if yes, does the server need to tell us their file sizes?
- do we need to store the lis
From: Jeff Hostetler
[RFC] Partial Clone and Fetch
=
This is a WIP RFC for a partial clone and fetch feature wherein the client
can request that the server omit various blobs from the packfile during
clone and fetch. Clients can later request omitted blobs (either
From: Jeff Hostetler
[RFC] Partial Clone and Fetch
=
This is a WIP RFC for a partial clone and fetch feature wherein the client
can request that the server omit various blobs from the packfile during
clone and fetch. Clients can later request omitted blobs (either
15 matches
Mail list logo