Re: [PATCH 0/7] cat-file --batch-check performance improvements

2013-07-12 Thread Jeff King
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 10:23:34AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jeff King writes: > > > The results for running (in linux.git): > > > > $ git rev-list --objects --all >objects > > $ git cat-file --batch-check='%(objectsize:disk)' /dev/null > > I can see how these patches are very logical

Re: [PATCH 0/7] cat-file --batch-check performance improvements

2013-07-12 Thread Junio C Hamano
Jeff King writes: > The results for running (in linux.git): > > $ git rev-list --objects --all >objects > $ git cat-file --batch-check='%(objectsize:disk)' /dev/null I can see how these patches are very logical avenue to grab only on-disk footprint for large number of objects, but among the

[PATCH 0/7] cat-file --batch-check performance improvements

2013-07-11 Thread Jeff King
In my earlier series introducing "git cat-file --batch-check=", found here: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/229761/focus=230041 I spent a little time optimizing revindex generation, and measured by requesting information on a single object from a large repository. This se