Re: [PATCH 0/6] receive-pack: quarantine pushed objects

2016-10-02 Thread Christian Couder
On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Jeff King wrote: > On Sun, Oct 02, 2016 at 11:20:59AM +0200, Christian Couder wrote: > >> I wonder if the patch you sent in: >> >> https://public-inbox.org/git/20160816144642.5ikkta4l5hyx6...@sigill.intra.peff.net/ >> >> is still useful or not. > > It is potentially

Re: [PATCH 0/6] receive-pack: quarantine pushed objects

2016-10-02 Thread Jeff King
On Sun, Oct 02, 2016 at 11:20:59AM +0200, Christian Couder wrote: > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Jeff King wrote: > > I've mentioned before on the list that GitHub "quarantines" objects > > while the pre-receive hook runs. Here are the patches to implement > > that. > > Great! Thanks for ups

Re: [PATCH 0/6] receive-pack: quarantine pushed objects

2016-10-02 Thread Christian Couder
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Jeff King wrote: > I've mentioned before on the list that GitHub "quarantines" objects > while the pre-receive hook runs. Here are the patches to implement > that. Great! Thanks for upstreaming these patches! I wonder if the patch you sent in: https://public-inb

[PATCH 0/6] receive-pack: quarantine pushed objects

2016-09-30 Thread Jeff King
I've mentioned before on the list that GitHub "quarantines" objects while the pre-receive hook runs. Here are the patches to implement that. The basic problem is that as-is, index-pack admits pushed objects into the main object database immediately, before the pre-receive hook runs. It _has_ to, s