Re: [PATCH 0/5] A series of performance enhancements in the memihash and name-cache area

2017-03-02 Thread Junio C Hamano
Jeff Hostetler writes: > Sorry, $DAYJOB got in the way (again). > > This is still on my short-list of things to take care of. > I should have something for you next week. That's perfectly OK. I just wanted a newer articule in my newsreader I can bookmark so that I won't forget ;-) No hurries.

RE: [PATCH 0/5] A series of performance enhancements in the memihash and name-cache area

2017-03-02 Thread Jeff Hostetler
Cc: Jeff King ; Johannes Schindelin ; git@vger.kernel.org; Jeff Hostetler Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] A series of performance enhancements in the memihash and name-cache area Jeff Hostetler writes: > On 2/14/2017 5:03 PM, Jeff King wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 12:31:46PM +0100,

Re: [PATCH 0/5] A series of performance enhancements in the memihash and name-cache area

2017-03-02 Thread Junio C Hamano
Jeff Hostetler writes: > On 2/14/2017 5:03 PM, Jeff King wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 12:31:46PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote: >> >>> On Windows, calls to memihash() and maintaining the istate.name_hash and >>> istate.dir_hash HashMaps take significant time on very large >>> repositories

Re: [PATCH 0/5] A series of performance enhancements in the memihash and name-cache area

2017-02-19 Thread Junio C Hamano
Jeff Hostetler writes: >> But the other Jeff sounded like a follow-up was to follow shortly if >> not imminent so I decided to allocate my time on other topics still >> only on the list first while waiting to see what happens. > > Sorry, I was out of the office for a family emergency on Thursday

RE: [PATCH 0/5] A series of performance enhancements in the memihash and name-cache area

2017-02-18 Thread Jeff Hostetler
From: Junio C Hamano [mailto:jch2...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Junio C Hamano > Jeff King writes: >> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 09:27:53AM -0500, Jeff Hostetler wrote: >> >>> I have some informal numbers in a spreadsheet. I was seeing >>> a 8-9% speed up on a status on my gigantic repo. >>> >>> I'l

RE: [PATCH 0/5] A series of performance enhancements in the memihash and name-cache area

2017-02-18 Thread Jeff Hostetler
> Jeff King writes: > >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 09:58:21PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> >>> Jeff Hostetler writes: >>> >>> > I'll try to put together a before/after perf-test to better >>> > demonstrate this. >>> >>> I didn't pick up the series while watching these exchanges, as I >>> didn

Re: [PATCH 0/5] A series of performance enhancements in the memihash and name-cache area

2017-02-18 Thread Junio C Hamano
Jeff King writes: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 09:58:21PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Jeff Hostetler writes: >> >> > I'll try to put together a before/after perf-test to better >> > demonstrate this. >> >> I didn't pick up the series while watching these exchanges, as I >> didn't know how q

Re: [PATCH 0/5] A series of performance enhancements in the memihash and name-cache area

2017-02-17 Thread Jeff King
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 09:58:21PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jeff Hostetler writes: > > > I'll try to put together a before/after perf-test to better > > demonstrate this. > > I didn't pick up the series while watching these exchanges, as I > didn't know how quick your turnaround would be,

Re: [PATCH 0/5] A series of performance enhancements in the memihash and name-cache area

2017-02-17 Thread Junio C Hamano
Jeff Hostetler writes: > I'll try to put together a before/after perf-test to better > demonstrate this. I didn't pick up the series while watching these exchanges, as I didn't know how quick your turnaround would be, but now a few days have passed. Just to make sure we won't forget this topic,

Re: [PATCH 0/5] A series of performance enhancements in the memihash and name-cache area

2017-02-17 Thread Junio C Hamano
Jeff King writes: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 09:27:53AM -0500, Jeff Hostetler wrote: > >> I have some informal numbers in a spreadsheet. I was seeing >> a 8-9% speed up on a status on my gigantic repo. >> >> I'll try to put together a before/after perf-test to better >> demonstrate this. > > Tha

Re: [PATCH 0/5] A series of performance enhancements in the memihash and name-cache area

2017-02-15 Thread Jeff King
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 09:27:53AM -0500, Jeff Hostetler wrote: > I have some informal numbers in a spreadsheet. I was seeing > a 8-9% speed up on a status on my gigantic repo. > > I'll try to put together a before/after perf-test to better > demonstrate this. Thanks. What I'm mostly curious ab

Re: [PATCH 0/5] A series of performance enhancements in the memihash and name-cache area

2017-02-15 Thread Jeff Hostetler
On 2/14/2017 5:03 PM, Jeff King wrote: On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 12:31:46PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote: On Windows, calls to memihash() and maintaining the istate.name_hash and istate.dir_hash HashMaps take significant time on very large repositories. This series of changes reduces the ov

Re: [PATCH 0/5] A series of performance enhancements in the memihash and name-cache area

2017-02-14 Thread Jeff King
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 12:31:46PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > On Windows, calls to memihash() and maintaining the istate.name_hash and > istate.dir_hash HashMaps take significant time on very large > repositories. This series of changes reduces the overall time taken for > various operati

[PATCH 0/5] A series of performance enhancements in the memihash and name-cache area

2017-02-14 Thread Johannes Schindelin
On Windows, calls to memihash() and maintaining the istate.name_hash and istate.dir_hash HashMaps take significant time on very large repositories. This series of changes reduces the overall time taken for various operations by reducing the number calls to memihash(), moving some of them into multi