On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Duy Nguyen writes:
>
>> How about this? git_check_attr() now takes dtype as an argument
>> and the caller must not add the trailing slash. This could be
>> split into two patches, one for git_check_attr prototype change,
>> and the other
Duy Nguyen writes:
> How about this? git_check_attr() now takes dtype as an argument
> and the caller must not add the trailing slash. This could be
> split into two patches, one for git_check_attr prototype change,
> and the other the real meat.
"git check-attr" fundamentally cannot know, but
qOn Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:39:27AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> So here is an attempt to fix the unintended regression, on top of
> 9db9eecfe5c2 (attr: avoid calling find_basename() twice per path,
> 2013-01-16). It consists of four patches.
Not that I disagree with this. Just wanted to see ho
So here is an attempt to fix the unintended regression, on top of
9db9eecfe5c2 (attr: avoid calling find_basename() twice per path,
2013-01-16). It consists of four patches.
The first patch is not essential to the fix, but I think it
clarifies what is going on in this codepath.
The second patch
4 matches
Mail list logo
