Re: [PATCH 0/4] Make check-{attr,ignore} -z consistent

2013-07-11 Thread Eric Sunshine
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 2:18 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > A command that has to deal with input/output that may contain LF > needs to offer the "-z" (--nul-terminated-records) option, and if it > does not support separate --nul-terminated-{input,output} options, > the "-z" option should govern both

[PATCH 0/4] Make check-{attr,ignore} -z consistent

2013-07-11 Thread Junio C Hamano
A command that has to deal with input/output that may contain LF needs to offer the "-z" (--nul-terminated-records) option, and if it does not support separate --nul-terminated-{input,output} options, the "-z" option should govern both input and output. A caller that uses "-z" knows that the paths