On Wed, 2018-12-19 at 00:59 -0500, John Passaro wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 6:10 PM John Passaro wrote:
> > All seems to work fine when I treat %Gs as a detached signature.
>
> In light of this, my best guess as to why the cleartext PGP message
> didn't verify properly is that the commit data
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 6:10 PM John Passaro wrote:
> All seems to work fine when I treat %Gs as a detached signature.
In light of this, my best guess as to why the cleartext PGP message
didn't verify properly is that the commit data normally doesn't end
with \n, but as far as I can tell there's n
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 11:07:03AM -0500, John Passaro wrote:
> Then I might rename the other new placeholders too:
>
> %Gs: signed commit signature (blank when unsigned)
> %Gp: signed commit payload (i.e. in practice minus the gpgsig header;
> also blank when unsigned as well)
One complication:
Michał Górny writes:
> Just a suggestion: since the raw signature is not very useful without
> the commit data to check it against, and the commit data is non-trivial
> to construct (requires mangling raw data anyway), maybe you could either
> add another placeholder to get the data for signature
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 6:10 PM John Passaro wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 11:49 AM Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2018-12-14 at 11:07 -0500, John Passaro wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 11:12 PM Michał Górny wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 2018-12-13 at 16:22 -0500, John Passaro w
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 11:49 AM Michał Górny wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2018-12-14 at 11:07 -0500, John Passaro wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 11:12 PM Michał Górny wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2018-12-13 at 16:22 -0500, John Passaro wrote:
> > > > Currently, users who do not have GPG installed have n
On Fri, 2018-12-14 at 11:07 -0500, John Passaro wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 11:12 PM Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2018-12-13 at 16:22 -0500, John Passaro wrote:
> > > Currently, users who do not have GPG installed have no way to discern
> > > signed from unsigned commits without exami
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 11:12 PM Michał Górny wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2018-12-13 at 16:22 -0500, John Passaro wrote:
> > Currently, users who do not have GPG installed have no way to discern
> > signed from unsigned commits without examining raw commit data. I
> > propose two new pretty-print placehold
On Thu, 2018-12-13 at 16:22 -0500, John Passaro wrote:
> Currently, users who do not have GPG installed have no way to discern
> signed from unsigned commits without examining raw commit data. I
> propose two new pretty-print placeholders to expose this information:
>
> %GR: full ("R"aw) contents
Currently, users who do not have GPG installed have no way to discern
signed from unsigned commits without examining raw commit data. I
propose two new pretty-print placeholders to expose this information:
%GR: full ("R"aw) contents of gpgsig header
%G+: Y/N if the commit has nonempty gpgsig heade
10 matches
Mail list logo
