On 01/23/2013 12:03 PM, John Keeping wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:54:36AM +0100, Michael Haggerty wrote:
>> On 01/20/2013 09:17 PM, Chris Rorvick wrote:
>>> I have never used cvs2git, but I suspect Eric's efforts in making it a
>>> potential backend for cvsimport are a better use of time.
>
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:54:36AM +0100, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> On 01/20/2013 09:17 PM, Chris Rorvick wrote:
>> I have never used cvs2git, but I suspect Eric's efforts in making it a
>> potential backend for cvsimport are a better use of time.
Is it possible to perform an incremental import wi
On 01/20/2013 09:17 PM, Chris Rorvick wrote:
> I probably won't be sending any more patches on this. My hope was to
> get cvsimport-3 (w/ cvsps as the engine) in a state such that one
> could transition from the previous version seamlessly. But the break
> in t9605 has convinced me this is not wo
> > I probably won't be sending any more patches on this. My hope was to
> > get cvsimport-3 (w/ cvsps as the engine) in a state such that one
> > could transition from the previous version seamlessly. But the break
> > in t9605 has convinced me this is not worth the effort--even in this
> > triv
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Chris Rorvick wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> John Keeping writes:
>>
>>> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 09:22:03AM -0600, Chris Rorvick wrote:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 6:58 AM, John Keeping wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 1
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 1:24 PM, John Keeping wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 10:57:50AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> This is not a noise, though.
>>
>> Chris, how would we want to proceed? I'd prefer at some point to
>> see cvsimport-3 to be in sync when the one patched and tested in
>> Eric
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> John Keeping writes:
>
>> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 09:22:03AM -0600, Chris Rorvick wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 6:58 AM, John Keeping wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:27:16PM -0600, Chris Rorvick wrote:
> These patchs apply
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 10:57:50AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> John Keeping writes:
>> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 09:22:03AM -0600, Chris Rorvick wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 6:58 AM, John Keeping wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:27:16PM -0600, Chris Rorvick wrote:
> These patchs
John Keeping writes:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 09:22:03AM -0600, Chris Rorvick wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 6:58 AM, John Keeping wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:27:16PM -0600, Chris Rorvick wrote:
These patchs apply on top of of Eric Raymond's cvsimport patch. 7 of 15
test
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 09:22:03AM -0600, Chris Rorvick wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 6:58 AM, John Keeping wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:27:16PM -0600, Chris Rorvick wrote:
>>> These patchs apply on top of of Eric Raymond's cvsimport patch. 7 of 15
>>> tests in t9600 fail, one of which
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 6:58 AM, John Keeping wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:27:16PM -0600, Chris Rorvick wrote:
>> These patchs apply on top of of Eric Raymond's cvsimport patch. 7 of 15
>> tests in t9600 fail, one of which is fixed w/ a cvsps patch I've sent
>> to Eric (fixes
Hi Chris,
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:27:16PM -0600, Chris Rorvick wrote:
> These patchs apply on top of of Eric Raymond's cvsimport patch. 7 of 15
> tests in t9600 fail, one of which is fixed w/ a cvsps patch I've sent
> to Eric (fixes revision map.)
Did you post the fix for the revision map pub
These patchs apply on top of of Eric Raymond's cvsimport patch. 7 of 15
tests in t9600 fail, one of which is fixed w/ a cvsps patch I've sent
to Eric (fixes revision map.) It no longer uses "origin" as the default
branch which I suspect is a problem for at least some of the remaining
tests. Both
13 matches
Mail list logo
