Aw: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Some small fixes to glossary-content.txt

2013-04-06 Thread Thomas Ackermann
> > > While proof-reading the user-manual I noticed some issues with > glossary-content.txt: > > I found now mention of my patches in the latest "What's cooking". Did I miss an action item on my side or got this lost in the noise? --- Thomas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "un

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Some small fixes to glossary-content.txt

2013-04-02 Thread Junio C Hamano
Thomas Ackermann writes: > While proof-reading the user-manual I noticed some issues with > glossary-content.txt: > > - There is some outdated, misleading or irrelevant information which might > only confuse > new Git users and should therefore be removed. > - The entries for object, object nam

[PATCH 0/3] Some small fixes to glossary-content.txt

2013-04-02 Thread Thomas Ackermann
While proof-reading the user-manual I noticed some issues with glossary-content.txt: - There is some outdated, misleading or irrelevant information which might only confuse new Git users and should therefore be removed. - The entries for object, object name and SHA1 lacked a little bit of cons