Re: [PATCH 0/3] "-x" tracing option for tests

2014-10-14 Thread Jeff King
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 10:52:30AM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote: > >> Is your plan to reroll the prune-mtime stuff on top of these? The > >> additional safety those patches would give us is valuable and they > >> are pretty straight-forward---I was hoping to have them in the 2.2 > >> release. >

Re: [PATCH 0/3] "-x" tracing option for tests

2014-10-14 Thread Michael Haggerty
On 10/13/2014 11:07 PM, Jeff King wrote: > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 11:24:42AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> [...] >> Is your plan to reroll the prune-mtime stuff on top of these? The >> additional safety those patches would give us is valuable and they >> are pretty straight-forward---I was hopi

Re: [PATCH 0/3] "-x" tracing option for tests

2014-10-13 Thread Jeff King
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 11:24:42AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jeff King writes: > > > These patches are pulled out of the prune-mtime series I posted > > earlier[1]. The discussion veered off and there's no reason that the two > > topics need to be part of the same series. > > These look al

Re: [PATCH 0/3] "-x" tracing option for tests

2014-10-13 Thread Junio C Hamano
Jeff King writes: > These patches are pulled out of the prune-mtime series I posted > earlier[1]. The discussion veered off and there's no reason that the two > topics need to be part of the same series. These look all sensible. Is your plan to reroll the prune-mtime stuff on top of these? The

[PATCH 0/3] "-x" tracing option for tests

2014-10-09 Thread Jeff King
These patches are pulled out of the prune-mtime series I posted earlier[1]. The discussion veered off and there's no reason that the two topics need to be part of the same series. The first patch is the same cleanup as before. The second one uses Michael's suggested "verbose" function, like: $