On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 05:59:05AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I do not offhand know if we want "show the current one only" option
> that is "command mode" sitting next to "list", "delete", "rename"
> etc., or "limit the operation to the one that is currently cheked
> out". If we want the forme
> I'd be happy to submit a documentation patch for discussion that
> formally moves rev-parse to plumbing.
I'd be happy to see such a patch.
On 10/10/18 5:03 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>
> I'm mildly negative on this because git-rev-parse is plumbing, but
> git-branch is porcelain [..]
>
> We also list git-rev-parse as porcelain, just under "Porcelain / Ancillary
> Commands / Interrogators".
>
> Should we just move it to plum
On Tue, Oct 09 2018, Daniels Umanovskis wrote:
> I often find myself needing the current branch name, for which
> currently there's git rev-parse --abrev-ref HEAD. I would expect `git
> branch` to have an option to output the branch name instead.
>
> This is my first patch to Git, so process-rel
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 05:59:05AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> But I do not think that is what is going on. There is "--list" that
> lists branches whose name match given patterns, and at the end-user
> level (I haven't seen the implementation) this is another mode of
> that operation that li
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 5:29 AM Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 4:59 PM Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > My inclination is to recommend to:
> >
> > (1) name the "show the current one" not "--current" but with some
> > verb
> >
> > (2) display nothing when there is no current branch
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 4:59 PM Junio C Hamano wrote:
> My inclination is to recommend to:
>
> (1) name the "show the current one" not "--current" but with some
> verb
>
> (2) display nothing when there is no current branch (i.e. detached
> HEAD) and without any error.
Sensible suggest
Daniels Umanovskis writes:
> I often find myself needing the current branch name, for which
> currently there's git rev-parse --abrev-ref HEAD. I would expect
> `git branch` to have an option to output the branch name instead.
[jc: wrapped an overlong line]
If "git branch" had many operations
I often find myself needing the current branch name, for which currently
there's git rev-parse --abrev-ref HEAD. I would expect `git branch` to have an
option to output the branch name instead.
This is my first patch to Git, so process-related comments (patch formatting,
et cetera) are quite we
9 matches
Mail list logo
