Re: [PATCH 0/2] Reorganize read-tree

2005-09-04 Thread Daniel Barkalow
On Sun, 4 Sep 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I got mostly done with this before Linus mentioned the possibility of > > having multiple index entries in the same stage for a single path. I > > finished it anyway, but I'm not sure that we won't want

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Reorganize read-tree

2005-09-04 Thread Junio C Hamano
Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I got mostly done with this before Linus mentioned the possibility of > having multiple index entries in the same stage for a single path. I > finished it anyway, but I'm not sure that we won't want to know which of > the common ancestors contributed w

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Reorganize read-tree

2005-08-31 Thread Daniel Barkalow
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Catalin Marinas wrote: > Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I got mostly done with this before Linus mentioned the possibility of > > having multiple index entries in the same stage for a single path. I > > finished it anyway, but I'm not sure that we won't want to

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Reorganize read-tree

2005-08-31 Thread Daniel Barkalow
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Dan, I really really *REALLY* wanted to try this out in "pu" > branch and even was about to rig some torture chamber for > testing before applying the patch, but you got the shiny blue > bat X-<. I'll send a replacement with the settings correct. > A

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Reorganize read-tree

2005-08-31 Thread Catalin Marinas
Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I got mostly done with this before Linus mentioned the possibility of > having multiple index entries in the same stage for a single path. I > finished it anyway, but I'm not sure that we won't want to know which of > the common ancestors contributed whi

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Reorganize read-tree

2005-08-30 Thread Junio C Hamano
Dan, I really really *REALLY* wanted to try this out in "pu" branch and even was about to rig some torture chamber for testing before applying the patch, but you got the shiny blue bat X-<. I've checked with both marc and gmane [*], and believe the problem is not on my end. The MUA seems to have

[PATCH 0/2] Reorganize read-tree

2005-08-30 Thread Daniel Barkalow
I got mostly done with this before Linus mentioned the possibility of having multiple index entries in the same stage for a single path. I finished it anyway, but I'm not sure that we won't want to know which of the common ancestors contributed which, and, if some of them don't have a path, we woul