Re: [PATCH 0/2] Breaking the ref-transactions-reflog series in smaller parts

2014-11-20 Thread Michael Haggerty
On 11/19/2014 10:40 PM, Stefan Beller wrote: > so I think the patch series ref-transactions-reflog[1] sent previously to the > list > is still too large for easy review and I want to break it up more. > So in this series we'll digest only 2 small patches, which do not seem to be > controversial (

[PATCH 0/2] Breaking the ref-transactions-reflog series in smaller parts

2014-11-19 Thread Stefan Beller
Hi, so I think the patch series ref-transactions-reflog[1] sent previously to the list is still too large for easy review and I want to break it up more. So in this series we'll digest only 2 small patches, which do not seem to be controversial (yet;) and seem to be useful no matter how the disc