Junio C Hamano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have not answered this because I have not made up my mind.
> Certainly (iii) is probably the least work for me.
Certainly? Probably? Which one? I should not start typing
before having a cup of coffee. **BLUSH**
Anyway, yes I would appreciate if
Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> (iii) Do wild things in the git-pb branch and send you patches.
>
> So I assume (iii) holds?
I have not answered this because I have not made up my mind.
Certainly (iii) is probably the least work for me.
My gut feeling is that I can deal with any of
Dear diary, on Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 10:58:19AM CEST, I got a letter
where Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> (i) Keep the git-pb branch polished and nice-to-merge, if you want to
> pull from it.
>
> (ii) Keep the git-pb branch polished and nice-to-merge and rebase it
> regularil
Hi,
those two bits were long kept local to git-pb. You can either apply
the patches or pull:
www.kernel.org/pub/scm/cogito/git-pb.git
The bits are mostly cosmetic but I want to get rid of them. :-)
I'd like to know what to do with the git-pb branch in the future.
Based on what do
4 matches
Mail list logo
