Re: [PATCH] update-cache --refresh cache entry leak

2005-04-16 Thread Junio C Hamano
> "LT" == Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: LT> I've seen this patch now three times, and it's been wrong every single LT> time. Maybe we should add a comment? I found out the previous two just after I sent it out. Sorry about that. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: [PATCH] update-cache --refresh cache entry leak

2005-04-16 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Sat, 16 Apr 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > When update-cache --refresh replaces an existing cache entry > with a new one, it forgets to free the original. I've seen this patch now three times, and it's been wrong every single time. Maybe we should add a comment? That active-cache entry you

[PATCH] update-cache --refresh cache entry leak

2005-04-16 Thread Junio C Hamano
When update-cache --refresh replaces an existing cache entry with a new one, it forgets to free the original. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- update-cache.c: 61d2b93a751f35ba24f479cd4fc151188916f02a --- update-cache.c +++ update-cache.c 2005-04-16 15:49:03.0 -07