On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 6:23 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Thinking about it more, I have to say that I do not agree with the
> basic premise of this patch. I-T-A is not "may want to commit, but
> they are untracked" at all. It is "I know I want to add, I just
> cannot yet decide the exact content
Junio C Hamano writes:
> Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy writes:
>
>> Intent-to-add entries are basically "I may want to commit these files
>> later, but for now they are untracked". As such, when the user does "git
>> reset --hard ", which removes i-t-a entries from the index, i-t-a
>> entries in worktre
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy writes:
> Intent-to-add entries are basically "I may want to commit these files
> later, but for now they are untracked". As such, when the user does "git
> reset --hard ", which removes i-t-a entries from the index, i-t-a
> entries in worktree should be kept as untracked.
Intent-to-add entries are basically "I may want to commit these files
later, but for now they are untracked". As such, when the user does "git
reset --hard ", which removes i-t-a entries from the index, i-t-a
entries in worktree should be kept as untracked.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
---
4 matches
Mail list logo
