On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 4:15 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Stefan Beller writes:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>> Stefan Beller writes:
>>>
Trying to push with --recurse-submodules=on-demand would run into
the same problem. To fix this issue
1) sp
Stefan Beller writes:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Stefan Beller writes:
>>
>>> Trying to push with --recurse-submodules=on-demand would run into
>>> the same problem. To fix this issue
>>> 1) specifically mention that we looked for branches on the remote.
>>
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Stefan Beller writes:
>
>> Trying to push with --recurse-submodules=on-demand would run into
>> the same problem. To fix this issue
>> 1) specifically mention that we looked for branches on the remote.
>
> That makes an incorrect statem
Stefan Beller writes:
> Trying to push with --recurse-submodules=on-demand would run into
> the same problem. To fix this issue
> 1) specifically mention that we looked for branches on the remote.
That makes an incorrect statement ("not found on any remote"---we
did not inspect all of the sa
When push.recurseSubmodules is set to "check" or "on-demand", the transport
layer tries to determine if a submodule needs pushing. This check is done
by walking all remote refs that are known.
For remotes we only store the refs/heads/* (and tags), which doesn't
include all commits. In e.g. Gerrit
5 matches
Mail list logo