Re: [PATCH] t6041: do not compress backup tar file

+ cc Jens as he authored both t6041 as well as t3513 in the series leading to ad25da009e2a3730 (2014-07-21, Merge branch 'jl/submodule-tests') On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Stefan Beller writes: > >> diff --git a/t/t6041-bisect-submodule.sh b/t/t6041-bisect-submodule.s

Re: [PATCH] t6041: do not compress backup tar file

Stefan Beller writes: > diff --git a/t/t6041-bisect-submodule.sh b/t/t6041-bisect-submodule.sh > index c6b7aa6..62b8a2e 100755 > --- a/t/t6041-bisect-submodule.sh > +++ b/t/t6041-bisect-submodule.sh > @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ test_description='bisect can handle submodules' > git_bisect () { > git s

Re: [PATCH] t6041: do not compress backup tar file

Hi Stefan, I'm currently in the process of skipping through the failed tests on my AIX box. There are more tests which require GNU tools like mktemp (t7610-mergetool.sh) or readlink (t7800-difftool.sh). But I don't have a solution or workaround for these two. But at least there are not more failin

[PATCH] t6041: do not compress backup tar file

The test uses the 'z' option, i.e. "compress the output while at it", which is GNUism and not portable. Reported-by: Armin Kunaschik Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller --- Thanks Armin for reporting these GNUism! Are there any more? (So we can do these patches as a series instead of one by one:)