Re: [PATCH] t0008: avoid SIGPIPE race condition on fifo

On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 09:23:54AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > In that case, check-ignore gets a SIGPIPE and dies. The > > outer shell then tries to open the output fifo but blocks > > indefinitely, because there is no writer. We can fix it by > > keeping a descriptor open through the whole

Re: [PATCH] t0008: avoid SIGPIPE race condition on fifo

On Jul 12, 2013, at 6:35 AM, Jeff King wrote: > Subject: [PATCH] t0008: avoid SIGPIPE race condition on fifo Was able to complete a prove run with this patch. Many thanks. ~~ Brian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a mess

Re: [PATCH] t0008: avoid SIGPIPE race condition on fifo

Jeff King writes: > Subject: [PATCH] t0008: avoid SIGPIPE race condition on fifo > > To test check-ignore's --stdin feature, we use two fifos to > send and receive data. We carefully keep a descriptor to its > input open so that it does not receive EOF between input > li

[PATCH] t0008: avoid SIGPIPE race condition on fifo

ould fix it. I'm still not sure why the choice of shell matters; it may simply be a timing fluke that bash is more likely to hit for some reason. -- >8 -- Subject: [PATCH] t0008: avoid SIGPIPE race condition on fifo To test check-ignore's --stdin feature, we use two fifos to send and receive