ere is what I tentatively queued.
Thanks.
-- >8 --
From: Ross Lagerwall
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 00:23:41 +
Subject: [PATCH] remote: ignore failure to remove missing branch..merge
It is not all too unusual for a branch to use "branch..remote"
without "branch..merge". You m
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 11:32:54AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Ross Lagerwall writes:
>
> > If a branch is configured with a default remote but no
> > branch..merge and then the remote is removed, git fails to remove
> > the remote with:
> > "fatal: could not unset 'branch..merge'"
> >
> > Ins
Ross Lagerwall writes:
> If a branch is configured with a default remote but no
> branch..merge and then the remote is removed, git fails to remove
> the remote with:
> "fatal: could not unset 'branch..merge'"
>
> Instead, ignore this since it is not an error and shouldn't prevent the
> remote fr
If a branch is configured with a default remote but no
branch..merge and then the remote is removed, git fails to remove
the remote with:
"fatal: could not unset 'branch..merge'"
Instead, ignore this since it is not an error and shouldn't prevent the
remote from being removed.
Signed-off-by: Ross
4 matches
Mail list logo
