Re: [PATCH] read-cache: fix untracked cache invalidation when split-index is used

2015-06-08 Thread Junio C Hamano
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy writes: > Before this change, t7063.17 fails. The actual action though happens at > t7063.16 where the entry "two" is added back to index after being > removed in the .13. Here we expect a directory invalidate at .16 and > none at .17 where untracked cache is refreshed. But

[PATCH] read-cache: fix untracked cache invalidation when split-index is used

2015-06-07 Thread Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
Before this change, t7063.17 fails. The actual action though happens at t7063.16 where the entry "two" is added back to index after being removed in the .13. Here we expect a directory invalidate at .16 and none at .17 where untracked cache is refreshed. But things do not go as expected when GIT_TE