Jeff King writes:
> I dunno. I wrote that original set of lua pretty-format patches to try
> to stop the insanity once and for all. But I realized that I do not
> actually want to do anything complicated with the output formats, and
> "--oneline" and a few simple "--format" calls usually are enou
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:19:21AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King writes:
>
> > Something like the patch below might work, but I didn't test it very
> > thoroughly (and note the comments, which might need dealing with). Maybe
> > it would make a sensible base for Harry to build on if h
Jeff King writes:
> Something like the patch below might work, but I didn't test it very
> thoroughly (and note the comments, which might need dealing with). Maybe
> it would make a sensible base for Harry to build on if he wants to
> pursue this.
>
> With it, you can do:
>
> git log --format='
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 11:17:20PM +0100, Harry Jeffery wrote:
> I definitely prefer your more general solution to my
> bare-minimum-to-scratch-itch patch. I'd certainly be willing to take your
> patch and expand upon it (pun unintended) once Junio has weighed in on your
> suggestions.
Thanks. I
On 09/09/14 22:45, Jeff King wrote:
Yeah, that was my thought on reading the initial patch, too. Why limit
ourselves to newlines and spaces. I'd much rather have full conditional
expansion, like "${foo:+prefix $foo suffix}" in the shell.
Something like the patch below might work, but I didn't te
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 12:37:48PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Harry Jeffery writes:
>
> > On 09/09/14 20:15, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >> Is this different from "%n%-d"?
> >>
> >
> > Yes. "%n%-d" will place the newline before the expansion, not after.
>
> Maybe "%[-+ ]" needs to be rethought,
Harry Jeffery writes:
> On 09/09/14 20:15, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Is this different from "%n%-d"?
>>
>
> Yes. "%n%-d" will place the newline before the expansion, not after.
Maybe "%[-+ ]" needs to be rethought, instead of making things worse
by turning it into "%[-_+ ]", as the next person wh
On 09/09/14 20:15, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Is this different from "%n%-d"?
Yes. "%n%-d" will place the newline before the expansion, not after.
log --decorate --pretty=format:"%n%-d%h\\ %t\\ [%cn]\\ %s"
---
(HEAD, upstream/master, master)85f0837 c29da1d [Junio C Hamano] Start
the post-2.1 cy
Harry Jeffery writes:
> Add a new format prefix `_` that causes a line-feed to be inserted
> immediately after an expansion if the expansion expands to a non-empty
> string. This is useful for when you would like a line for an expansion
> to be prepended, but only when the expansion expands to a
Add a new format prefix `_` that causes a line-feed to be inserted
immediately after an expansion if the expansion expands to a non-empty
string. This is useful for when you would like a line for an expansion
to be prepended, but only when the expansion expands to a non empty
string, such as inser
10 matches
Mail list logo
