On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 09:21:24AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King writes:
>
> > I think we can take your patch a step further, though, like:
> >
> > -- >8 --
> > Subject: [PATCH] drop add_object_array_with_mode
> > ...
>
> Thanks. I think I picked up all incrementals in this thread,
Jeff King writes:
> I think we can take your patch a step further, though, like:
>
> -- >8 --
> Subject: [PATCH] drop add_object_array_with_mode
> ...
Thanks. I think I picked up all incrementals in this thread, but
please holler if I missed anything.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
On 19/10/14 03:03, Jeff King wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 12:19:07AM +0100, Ramsay Jones wrote:
>
[snip]
> I actually wondered while writing this series whether anyone actually
> _uses_ the mode in object_array (the new code I added sets it to the
> appropriate value to be on the safe side,
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 12:19:07AM +0100, Ramsay Jones wrote:
> I noticed that your 'jk/prune-mtime' branch also removes the only
> call to the add_object_array_with_mode() function outside of the
> object.c file; specifically commit 75ac69fa ("traverse_commit_list:
> support pending blobs/trees w
Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones
---
Hi Jeff,
I noticed that your 'jk/prune-mtime' branch also removes the only
call to the add_object_array_with_mode() function outside of the
object.c file; specifically commit 75ac69fa ("traverse_commit_list:
support pending blobs/trees with paths", 15-10-2014).
5 matches
Mail list logo