Duy Nguyen writes:
>>> Or even better to show an error message when the error code is
>>> unexpected? The unkown tag '!' says "there are problems" but if it
>>> shows up sort of permanently, '!' won't help much, I think.
>>
>> I am OK with that approach, but then one question remains: should we
>
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Duy Nguyen writes:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 1:15 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>> I am guessing that, even though this was discovered during the
>>> development of list-files, is a fix applicable outside the context
>>> of that series.
>>>
Duy Nguyen writes:
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 1:15 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> I am guessing that, even though this was discovered during the
>> development of list-files, is a fix applicable outside the context
>> of that series.
>>
>> I do think the patched result is an improvement than the sta
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 1:15 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I am guessing that, even though this was discovered during the
> development of list-files, is a fix applicable outside the context
> of that series.
>
> I do think the patched result is an improvement than the status quo,
> but at the same t
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy writes:
> If 'err' is non-zero, lstat() has failed. Consider the entry modified
> without passing the (unreliable) stat info to ce_modified() in this
> case.
>
> Noticed-by: Eric Sunshine
> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
> ---
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Eric
If 'err' is non-zero, lstat() has failed. Consider the entry modified
without passing the (unreliable) stat info to ce_modified() in this
case.
Noticed-by: Eric Sunshine
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
---
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Eric Sunshine
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9
6 matches
Mail list logo
