On 13 Nov 2015, at 21:02, Ramsay Jones wrote:
>
>
> On 13/11/15 08:57, Eric Sunshine wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 3:46 AM, Lars Schneider
>> wrote:
>>> On 11 Nov 2015, at 18:49, Ramsay Jones wrote:
On 11/11/15 02:00, Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Eric
On 13/11/15 08:57, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 3:46 AM, Lars Schneider
> wrote:
>> On 11 Nov 2015, at 18:49, Ramsay Jones wrote:
>>> On 11/11/15 02:00, Stefan Beller wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Eric Sunshine
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 7:23 PM
> On 13 Nov 2015, at 11:32, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
>
> On 2015-11-13 09.57, Eric Sunshine wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 3:46 AM, Lars Schneider
>> wrote:
>>> On 11 Nov 2015, at 18:49, Ramsay Jones wrote:
On 11/11/15 02:00, Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 5:22 P
On 2015-11-13 09.57, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 3:46 AM, Lars Schneider
> wrote:
>> On 11 Nov 2015, at 18:49, Ramsay Jones wrote:
>>> On 11/11/15 02:00, Stefan Beller wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Eric Sunshine
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 7:23 PM
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 3:46 AM, Lars Schneider
wrote:
> On 11 Nov 2015, at 18:49, Ramsay Jones wrote:
>> On 11/11/15 02:00, Stefan Beller wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Eric Sunshine
>>> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 7:23 PM, Ramsay Jones
wrote:
> Commit f8117f55 (
On 11 Nov 2015, at 18:49, Ramsay Jones wrote:
>
>
> On 11/11/15 02:00, Stefan Beller wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Eric Sunshine
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 7:23 PM, Ramsay Jones
>>> wrote:
Commit f8117f55 ("http: use off_t to store partial file size",
02-11
Torsten Bögershausen writes:
> So whenever a long long is printed, I can warmly recommend to use
>
> PRId64
PRId64 is not suitable for long long, only for int64_t.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And n
On 12/11/15 05:27, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
>>Ah. OK, so %ld for long and %lld for long long, I suppose.
> Only if you have a system that's support it.
>
> Linux does, Windows not.
Sure, but I was speculating specifically about Eric's mac (which I
have no experience with).
>
>> Hmm, not th
>Ah. OK, so %ld for long and %lld for long long, I suppose. Only if you
have a system that's support it.
Linux does, Windows not.
Hmm, not that it matters, but I wonder what the PRId64 macro is. ;-)
It's "I64d" for Windows, and "lld" for all Gnu based systems and others,
When you do printf("
On 11/11/15 20:31, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Ramsay Jones
> wrote:
>> On 11/11/15 01:22, Eric Sunshine wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 7:23 PM, Ramsay Jones
>>> wrote:
>>> My machine is 64-bit, though, so perhaps it's misleading to
>>> characterize this as a fi
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 03:31:01PM -0500, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> The fact that 'long' and 'long long' happen to be the same size (in
> this case) is immaterial. What is important is that the code is just
> wrong to be using the "%l" specifier for 'long' when the actual
> datatype is 'long long' (w
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Ramsay Jones
wrote:
> On 11/11/15 01:22, Eric Sunshine wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 7:23 PM, Ramsay Jones
>> wrote:
>> My machine is 64-bit, though, so perhaps it's misleading to
>> characterize this as a fix for 32-bit builds. In particular, off_t is
>> 'lo
On 11/11/15 02:00, Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Eric Sunshine
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 7:23 PM, Ramsay Jones
>> wrote:
>>> Commit f8117f55 ("http: use off_t to store partial file size",
>>> 02-11-2015) changed the type of some variables from long to off_t.
On 11/11/15 01:22, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 7:23 PM, Ramsay Jones
> wrote:
>> Commit f8117f55 ("http: use off_t to store partial file size",
>> 02-11-2015) changed the type of some variables from long to off_t.
>> The 32-bit build, which enables the large filesystem interfa
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:02 AM, Lars Schneider
wrote:
>
> Unfortunately no. All their machines are 64-bit [1] and they have "no
> immediate plans to add this feature" [2].
> However, we could the following build configuration on a 64-bit machine:
>
> export CFLAGS="-m32"
> export LDFLAGS="-m32"
On 11 Nov 2015, at 03:00, Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Eric Sunshine
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 7:23 PM, Ramsay Jones
>> wrote:
>>> Commit f8117f55 ("http: use off_t to store partial file size",
>>> 02-11-2015) changed the type of some variables from long t
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 7:23 PM, Ramsay Jones
> wrote:
>> Commit f8117f55 ("http: use off_t to store partial file size",
>> 02-11-2015) changed the type of some variables from long to off_t.
>> The 32-bit build, which enables the large files
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 7:23 PM, Ramsay Jones
wrote:
> Commit f8117f55 ("http: use off_t to store partial file size",
> 02-11-2015) changed the type of some variables from long to off_t.
> The 32-bit build, which enables the large filesystem interface
> (_FILE_OFFSET_BITS == 64), defines the off_t
Commit f8117f55 ("http: use off_t to store partial file size",
02-11-2015) changed the type of some variables from long to off_t.
The 32-bit build, which enables the large filesystem interface
(_FILE_OFFSET_BITS == 64), defines the off_t type as a 64-bit
integer, whereas long is a 32-bit integer.
19 matches
Mail list logo
