Junio C Hamano writes:
> Has either of you tried the patch with the problematic case the
> other patch tries to solve? Michal's old patch does smell like it
> is going in the better direction in that it stops looping when we
> know we would only be showing the padding, which is a sign that we
>
Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy writes:
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Michal Kiedrowicz
> wrote:
>> Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>>
>>> The loop can be triggered with "git diff-tree --graph commit" where
>>> the commit is a non-merge. It goes like this
>>
>>
>> Isn't this the same issu
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Michal Kiedrowicz
wrote:
> Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy gmail.com> writes:
>
>>
>> The loop can be triggered with "git diff-tree --graph commit" where
>> the commit is a non-merge. It goes like this
>
>
> Isn't this the same issue as in
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.co
The loop can be triggered with "git diff-tree --graph commit" where
the commit is a non-merge. It goes like this
- graph_show_commit
- graph_next_line
- graph_output_padding_line
The last function quits because graph->commit is NULL, but
graph_next_line() does not return "shown", so the loop i
4 matches
Mail list logo