On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 10:16:47PM +0100, Maurice Bos wrote:
> I have no clue why git diff --cached isn't used instead of git diff-index.
> I was wondering about it, but I decided I don't know enough about git and
> there are probably valid reasons for doing it this way. Though, replacing
> it wit
I have no clue why git diff --cached isn't used instead of git
diff-index. I was wondering about it, but I decided I don't know
enough about git and there are probably valid reasons for doing it
this way. Though, replacing it with with git diff --cached seems to
have the exact same behaviour, as fa
For unborn branches, it now compares the index against the empty tree.
(Just like git status does.)
Signed-off-by: Maurice Bos
---
contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh | 10 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh b/contrib/completion
3 matches
Mail list logo
