Cornelius Weig writes:
> Sorry, I forgot to mark this patch as follow-up to message
>
I appreciate that you are very considerate, but in practice, if you
do not have too many topics in flight and your response time is less
than 48 hours, we can tell which new message is about which older
discus
From: "Stefan Beller"
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 12:01 PM, wrote:
From: Cornelius Weig
The documentation for submission discourages pgp-signing, but demands
a proper sign-off by contributors. However, when skimming the headings,
the wording of the section for sign-off could mistakenly be under
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Cornelius Weig
wrote:
>>
>> So maybe s/signed-off-by/helped-by/?
>>
>
> This is getting real complex :-/
uh; sorry for that. I do not mind the patch as posted,
just in case you reroll for another reason, this is worth thinking about.
In fact, as said before I li
>
> So maybe s/signed-off-by/helped-by/?
>
This is getting real complex :-/
As I said in the notes for the patch:
>> As I don't know what is appropriate, I took the liberty to add
>> everybody's
>> sign-off who was involved in the discussion in alphabetic order.
With your explanation
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 12:01 PM, wrote:
> From: Cornelius Weig
>
> The documentation for submission discourages pgp-signing, but demands
> a proper sign-off by contributors. However, when skimming the headings,
> the wording of the section for sign-off could mistakenly be understood
> as concer
From: Cornelius Weig
The documentation for submission discourages pgp-signing, but demands
a proper sign-off by contributors. However, when skimming the headings,
the wording of the section for sign-off could mistakenly be understood
as concerning pgp-signing. Thus, new contributors could oversee
Sorry, I forgot to mark this patch as follow-up to message
7 matches
Mail list logo
