Re: [PATCH] contrib: remove gitview

2017-01-01 Thread Aneesh Kumar K.V
Jeff King writes: > On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 09:28:37AM -0800, Stefan Beller wrote: > >> gitview did not have meaningful contributions since 2007, which gives the >> impression it is either a mature or dead project. >> >> In both cases we should not carry it in git.git as the README for contrib >

Re: [PATCH] contrib: remove gitview

2016-12-31 Thread Junio C Hamano
Jeff King writes: > On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 09:28:37AM -0800, Stefan Beller wrote: > ... >> 2 files changed, 1362 deletions(-) >> delete mode 100755 contrib/gitview/gitview >> delete mode 100644 contrib/gitview/gitview.txt > > Thanks for assembling the patch. This seems reasonable to me, thoug

Re: [PATCH] contrib: remove gitview

2016-12-28 Thread Jeff King
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 09:28:37AM -0800, Stefan Beller wrote: > gitview did not have meaningful contributions since 2007, which gives the > impression it is either a mature or dead project. > > In both cases we should not carry it in git.git as the README for contrib > states we only want to car

Re: [PATCH] contrib: remove gitview

2016-12-28 Thread Javantea
Dear Stefan, Thank you for commenting on my report and getting the ball rolling on this. This response sounds good to me. Regards, Javantea On Wed, 28 Dec 2016 09:28:37 -0800, Stefan Beller wrote: >gitview did not have meaningful contributions since 2007, which gives the >impression it is eith

[PATCH] contrib: remove gitview

2016-12-28 Thread Stefan Beller
gitview did not have meaningful contributions since 2007, which gives the impression it is either a mature or dead project. In both cases we should not carry it in git.git as the README for contrib states we only want to carry experimental things to give early exposure. Recently a security vulner