On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 5:42 PM Jeff King wrote:
>
> We've never had a formally written Code of Conduct document. Though it
> has been discussed off and on over the years, for the most part the
> behavior on the mailing list has been good enough that nobody felt the
> need to push one forward.
>
>
Hi,
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019, Jeff King wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 10:14:55PM +0200, René Scharfe wrote:
>
> > > +* Trolling, insulting/derogatory comments, and personal or
> > > political attacks
> >
> > Hmm. Trolling can be helpful, if done right. I consider this to be
> > a good example: ht
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
A CoC can very easily create clarity in such circumstances. By stating
explicitly the standards to which we promise to hold ourselves, as well as
others. And it can even help those who think of themselves as decent to
improve on that front.
As
> > I've cc'd g...@sfconservancy.org here, because I think it's important for
> > all of the project committee members to endorse it (and because the
> > document puts us on the hook for enforcing it!).
>
> I tried looking it up but I couldn't find who the project committee
> members are. Is this l
On 2019-09-24 at 06:44:54, Jeff King wrote:
> We've never had a formally written Code of Conduct document. Though it
> has been discussed off and on over the years, for the most part the
> behavior on the mailing list has been good enough that nobody felt the
> need to push one forward.
>
> Howeve
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 10:14:55PM +0200, René Scharfe wrote:
> > +* Trolling, insulting/derogatory comments, and personal or political
> > attacks
>
> Hmm. Trolling can be helpful, if done right. I consider this to be a
> good example: https://git-man-page-generator.lokaltog.net/. Wrote some
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 01:35:33AM +0530, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> > As I said above, I couldn't find a public list of the people who were on
> > the project committee. Perhaps that's because my Googling skills are bad
> > but I feel uncomfortable knowing that *anyone* will be given judge, jury
> >
On 9/24/19 3:05 PM, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
On 24/09/19 10:12AM, Denton Liu wrote:
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 02:44:54AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
+## Enforcement
+
+Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
+reported by contacting the project team at g...@sfconserva
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 10:12:14AM -0700, Denton Liu wrote:
> > I've cc'd g...@sfconservancy.org here, because I think it's important for
> > all of the project committee members to endorse it (and because the
> > document puts us on the hook for enforcing it!).
>
> I tried looking it up but I co
Am 24.09.19 um 08:44 schrieb Jeff King:> +Examples of unacceptable behavior by
participants include:> +> +* The use of sexualized language or imagery and
unwelcome sexual attention or> + advances
Sure.
> +* Trolling, insulting/derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks
Hmm. Trolli
On 24/09/19 10:12AM, Denton Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 02:44:54AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> > +## Enforcement
> > +
> > +Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
> > +reported by contacting the project team at g...@sfconservancy.org. All
> > +complaints w
On 09/24, Jeff King wrote:
> We've never had a formally written Code of Conduct document. Though it
> has been discussed off and on over the years, for the most part the
> behavior on the mailing list has been good enough that nobody felt the
> need to push one forward.
>
> However, even if there
> If people are on board with this direction, it might be fun to pick up a
> bunch of "Acked-by" trailers from people in the community who agree with
> it. It might give it more weight if many members have publicly endorsed
> it.
Thanks for starting this. I think Peff has stated better what I woul
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 02:44:54AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> We've never had a formally written Code of Conduct document. Though it
> has been discussed off and on over the years, for the most part the
> behavior on the mailing list has been good enough that nobody felt the
> need to push one forwa
Hi all,
Deb here from Git's fiscal home. Let us know if you need any advice or
help finding a professional consultant to take a look at the Code of
Conduct document for you. I'm also happy to perosanlly take a look at
any draft(s).
Best,
Deb
On Tue, 2019-09-24 at 12:53 -0400, Garima Singh wrote
On 9/24/2019 2:44 AM, Jeff King wrote:
>
> If people are on board with this direction, it might be fun to pick up a
> bunch of "Acked-by" trailers from people in the community who agree with
> it. It might give it more weight if many members have publicly endorsed
> it.
>
> I've cc'd g...@sfconse
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 08:13:27AM -0400, Derrick Stolee wrote:
> > I did find this nice set of guidelines in an old discussion:
> >
> >
> > https://github.com/mhagger/git/commit/c6e6196be8fab3d48b12c4e42eceae6937538dee
>
> While this document has good information, most of it would be better
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 03:20:42PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > If diversity and inclusion of other cultures is indeed a priority,
> > then we should carefully consider that some potential contributors
> > will rather choose not to contribute because of a CoC like this.
>
> Let me be blu
Hi Gábor
On 24/09/2019 10:01, SZEDER Gábor wrote:
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 02:44:54AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
[...]
After some poking around at various CoC options, this one seemed like
the best fit to me. But I'm open to suggestions or more discussion. It
seems to me that the important piece i
Hi Peff
On 24/09/2019 07:44, Jeff King wrote:
We've never had a formally written Code of Conduct document. Though it
has been discussed off and on over the years, for the most part the
behavior on the mailing list has been good enough that nobody felt the
need to push one forward.
However, even
Hi Gábor,
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019, SZEDER Gábor wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 02:44:54AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> > We've never had a formally written Code of Conduct document. Though it
> > has been discussed off and on over the years, for the most part the
> > behavior on the mailing list has b
On 9/24/2019 2:44 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> We've never had a formally written Code of Conduct document. Though it
> has been discussed off and on over the years, for the most part the
> behavior on the mailing list has been good enough that nobody felt the
> need to push one forward.
>
> However, ev
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 02:44:54AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> We've never had a formally written Code of Conduct document. Though it
> has been discussed off and on over the years, for the most part the
> behavior on the mailing list has been good enough that nobody felt the
> need to push one forwa
We've never had a formally written Code of Conduct document. Though it
has been discussed off and on over the years, for the most part the
behavior on the mailing list has been good enough that nobody felt the
need to push one forward.
However, even if there aren't specific problems now, it's a go
24 matches
Mail list logo
