Re: [PATCH] Unicode: update of combining code points

2014-04-24 Thread Peter Krefting
Torsten Bögershausen: Some of the code points which have "0 length on the display" are called "combining", others are called "vowels" or "accents". E.g. 5BF is not marked any of them, but if you look at the glyph, it should be combining (please correct me if that is wrong). All combining chara

Re: [PATCH] Unicode: update of combining code points

2014-04-16 Thread Kevin Bracey
On 16/04/2014 22:58, Torsten Bögershausen wrote: Excellent, thanks for the pointers. Running the script below shows that "0X00AD SOFT HYPHEN" should have zero length (and some others too). I wonder if that is really the case, and which one of the last 2 lines in the script is the right one. What

Re: [PATCH] Unicode: update of combining code points

2014-04-16 Thread Torsten Bögershausen
On 2014-04-16 12.51, Kevin Bracey wrote: > On 16/04/2014 07:48, Torsten Bögershausen wrote: >> On 15.04.14 21:10, Peter Krefting wrote: >>> Torsten Bögershausen: >>> diff --git a/utf8.c b/utf8.c index a831d50..77c28d4 100644 --- a/utf8.c +++ b/utf8.c >>> Is there a script that g

Re: [PATCH] Unicode: update of combining code points

2014-04-16 Thread Kevin Bracey
On 16/04/2014 07:48, Torsten Bögershausen wrote: On 15.04.14 21:10, Peter Krefting wrote: Torsten Bögershausen: diff --git a/utf8.c b/utf8.c index a831d50..77c28d4 100644 --- a/utf8.c +++ b/utf8.c Is there a script that generates this code from the Unicode database files, or did you hand-upd

Re: [PATCH] Unicode: update of combining code points

2014-04-15 Thread Torsten Bögershausen
On 15.04.14 21:10, Peter Krefting wrote: > Torsten Bögershausen: > >> diff --git a/utf8.c b/utf8.c >> index a831d50..77c28d4 100644 >> --- a/utf8.c >> +++ b/utf8.c > > Is there a script that generates this code from the Unicode database files, > or did you hand-update it? > Some of the code poi

Re: [PATCH] Unicode: update of combining code points

2014-04-15 Thread Peter Krefting
Torsten Bögershausen: diff --git a/utf8.c b/utf8.c index a831d50..77c28d4 100644 --- a/utf8.c +++ b/utf8.c Is there a script that generates this code from the Unicode database files, or did you hand-update it? -- \\// Peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: se

Re: [PATCH] Unicode: update of combining code points

2014-04-09 Thread Torsten Bögershausen
Excellent, thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH] Unicode: update of combining code points

2014-04-09 Thread Junio C Hamano
Torsten Bögershausen writes: > How about this as a commit message: > > Unicode: partially update to version 6.3 > > Unicode 6.3 defines the following code points as combining or accents, > git_wcwidth() should return 0. > > Earlier unicode standards had defined these code point as "reserved": > 3

Re: [PATCH] Unicode: update of combining code points

2014-04-09 Thread Torsten Bögershausen
On 04/09/2014 12:37 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jonathan Nieder writes: > >> Torsten Bögershausen wrote: >> >>> Unicode 6.3 defines the following code as combining or accents, >>> git_wcwidth() should return 0. >>> >>> Earlier unicode standards had defined these code point as "reserved": >> Thanks

Re: [PATCH] Unicode: update of combining code points

2014-04-08 Thread Junio C Hamano
Jonathan Nieder writes: > Torsten Bögershausen wrote: > >> Unicode 6.3 defines the following code as combining or accents, >> git_wcwidth() should return 0. >> >> Earlier unicode standards had defined these code point as "reserved": > > Thanks for the update. Could the commit message also explai

Re: [PATCH] Unicode: update of combining code points

2014-04-07 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi, Torsten Bögershausen wrote: > Unicode 6.3 defines the following code as combining or accents, > git_wcwidth() should return 0. > > Earlier unicode standards had defined these code point as "reserved": Thanks for the update. Could the commit message also explain how this was noticed and what

[PATCH] Unicode: update of combining code points

2014-04-07 Thread Torsten Bögershausen
Unicode 6.3 defines the following code as combining or accents, git_wcwidth() should return 0. Earlier unicode standards had defined these code point as "reserved": 358 COMBINING DOT ABOVE RIGHT 359 COMBINING ASTERISK BELOW 35A COMBINING DOUBLE RING BELOW 35B COMBINING ZIGZAG ABOVE 35C COMBINING

[PATCH] Unicode: update of combining code points

2014-04-07 Thread Torsten Bögershausen
Unicode 6.3 defines the following code as combining or accents, git_wcwidth() should return 0. Earlier unicode standards had defined these code point as "reserved": 358 COMBINING DOT ABOVE RIGHT 359 COMBINING ASTERISK BELOW 35A COMBINING DOUBLE RING BELOW 35B COMBINING ZIGZAG ABOVE 35C COMBINING

[PATCH] Unicode: update of combining code points

2014-04-07 Thread Torsten Bögershausen
Unicode 6.3 defines the following code as combining or accents, git_wcwidth() should return 0. Earlier unicode standards had defined these code point as "reserved": 358 COMBINING DOT ABOVE RIGHT 359 COMBINING ASTERISK BELOW 35A COMBINING DOUBLE RING BELOW 35B COMBINING ZIGZAG ABOVE 35C COMBINING

[PATCH] Unicode: update of combining code points

2014-04-07 Thread Torsten Bögershausen
Unicode 6.3 defines the following code as combining or accents, git_wcwidth() should return 0. Earlier unicode standards had defined these code point as "reserved": 358 COMBINING DOT ABOVE RIGHT 359 COMBINING ASTERISK BELOW 35A COMBINING DOUBLE RING BELOW 35B COMBINING ZIGZAG ABOVE 35C COMBINING