On Thursday, March 20, 2014 01:45:21 PM Junio C Hamano wrote:
> There hasn't been any argument for this patch, either.
>
> It is not like we are still in year 2007; timing result in a small
> project like Git itself is not a good enough argument to change a
> well established default at this late
Michael Andreen writes:
> There hasn't been any arguments against this patch. Just updated the message
> with a note about --no-minimal.
There hasn't been any argument for this patch, either.
It is not like we are still in year 2007; timing result in a small
project like Git itself is not a go
Currently git blame has a big problem finding copies and moves when you
split up a big file into smaller ones. One example in the git repository
is 2cf565c, which split the documentation into smaller files.
In 582aa00 XDF_NEED_MINIMAL was removed as the default for performance
reasons, mainly for
On Sunday, March 16, 2014 01:12:01 PM Thomas Rast wrote:
> Michael Andreen writes:
>
> > The --minimal flag is still there, but didn't want to break scripts
> > depending on it.
>
> If I specify --no-minimal, does that turn it off again?
>
Yes, that works.
/Michael
--
To unsubscribe from this
Michael Andreen writes:
> The --minimal flag is still there, but didn't want to break scripts
> depending on it.
If I specify --no-minimal, does that turn it off again?
--
Thomas Rast
t...@thomasrast.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message
Currently git blame has a big problem finding copies and moves when you
split up a big file into smaller ones. One example in the git repository
is 2cf565c, which split the documentation into smaller files.
In 582aa00 XDF_NEED_MINIMAL was removed as the default for performance
reasons, mainly for
6 matches
Mail list logo
