Duy Nguyen writes:
> This "return NULL;" means we ignore "!blah" pattern, which is a
> regression, isn't it? Should we treat '!' as literal here?
Probably not. Can you point to a project everybody has heard of
that keeps track of a path that begins with an exclamation point?
With clarification
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 3:06 AM, Thomas Rast wrote:
> Before 82dce99 (attr: more matching optimizations from .gitignore,
> 2012-10-15), .gitattributes did not have any special treatment of a
> leading '!'. The docs, however, always said
>
> The rules how the pattern matches paths are the same as
Thomas Rast writes:
> Junio C Hamano writes:
>
>> Thomas Rast writes:
>>
>>> Before 82dce99 (attr: more matching optimizations from .gitignore,
>>> 2012-10-15), .gitattributes did not have any special treatment of a
>>> leading '!'. The docs, however, always said
>>>
>>> The rules how the pa
Junio C Hamano writes:
> Thomas Rast writes:
>
>> Before 82dce99 (attr: more matching optimizations from .gitignore,
>> 2012-10-15), .gitattributes did not have any special treatment of a
>> leading '!'. The docs, however, always said
>>
>> The rules how the pattern matches paths are the same
Thomas Rast writes:
> Before 82dce99 (attr: more matching optimizations from .gitignore,
> 2012-10-15), .gitattributes did not have any special treatment of a
> leading '!'. The docs, however, always said
>
> The rules how the pattern matches paths are the same as in
> `.gitignore` files; se
Makes sense. Duy?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Before 82dce99 (attr: more matching optimizations from .gitignore,
2012-10-15), .gitattributes did not have any special treatment of a
leading '!'. The docs, however, always said
The rules how the pattern matches paths are the same as in
`.gitignore` files; see linkgit:gitignore[5].
By those
7 matches
Mail list logo
