On 03/22/2014 12:11 AM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 5:18 AM, Ashwin Jha wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Eric Sunshine
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Ashwin Jha wrote:
Subject: [PATCH] GSoC Miniproject 15. Rewrite fsck.c:fsck_commit()
starts_with() seems
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 5:18 AM, Ashwin Jha wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Eric Sunshine
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Ashwin Jha wrote:
>> > Subject: [PATCH] GSoC Miniproject 15. Rewrite fsck.c:fsck_commit()
>> > starts_with() seems
Original Message
Subject:[PATCH] GSoC Miniproject 15. Rewrite fsck.c:fsck_commit()
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 07:24:46 +0530
From: Ashwin Jha
To: git@vger.kernel.org
CC: Ashwin Jha
modified fsck.c:fsck_commit(). Replaced memcmp() with starts_with() function
Thanks for the submission. Comments below to give you a feel for the
Git review process...
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Ashwin Jha wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH] GSoC Miniproject 15. Rewrite fsck.c:fsck_commit()
The subject becomes part of the permanent Git history, but the fact
that this i
modified fsck.c:fsck_commit(). Replaced memcmp() with starts_with() function.
starts_with() seems much more relevant than memcmp(). It uses one less argument
and its return value makes more sense.
skip_prefix() is not used as it uses strcmp() internally which seems
unnecessarily
for current task.
5 matches
Mail list logo