Re: [PATCH] Documentation/submodule: Fix submodule. -> . typos

2014-03-28 Thread W. Trevor King
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 05:55:18PM +0100, Jens Lehmann wrote: > I just noticed that the two patches Junio added to pu have a > reworded commit message I'm perfectly happy with. The revised wording works for me too. Cheers, Trevor -- This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.g

Re: [PATCH] Documentation/submodule: Fix submodule. -> . typos

2014-03-28 Thread Jens Lehmann
I just noticed that the two patches Junio added to pu have a reworded commit message I'm perfectly happy with. Thanks all. Am 28.03.2014 03:06, schrieb W. Trevor King: > On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:15:00AM +0100, Jens Lehmann wrote: >> Am 27.03.2014 22:06, schrieb W. Trevor King: >>> The transitio

Re: [PATCH] Documentation/submodule: Fix submodule. -> . typos

2014-03-27 Thread W. Trevor King
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:15:00AM +0100, Jens Lehmann wrote: > Am 27.03.2014 22:06, schrieb W. Trevor King: > > The transition from submodule..* to submodule..* happened > > in 73b0898d (Teach "git submodule add" the --name option, 2012-09-30), > > which landed in v1.8.1-rc0 on 2012-12-03. > > No

Re: [PATCH] Documentation/submodule: Fix submodule. -> . typos

2014-03-27 Thread Jens Lehmann
Am 27.03.2014 22:06, schrieb W. Trevor King: > The transition from submodule..* to submodule..* happened > in 73b0898d (Teach "git submodule add" the --name option, 2012-09-30), > which landed in v1.8.1-rc0 on 2012-12-03. Nope, the distinction between path and name is way older (AFAIK it is there

[PATCH] Documentation/submodule: Fix submodule. -> . typos

2014-03-27 Thread W. Trevor King
The transition from submodule..* to submodule..* happened in 73b0898d (Teach "git submodule add" the --name option, 2012-09-30), which landed in v1.8.1-rc0 on 2012-12-03. The first submodule..branch reference landed a short time later in b9289227 (submodule add: If --branch is given, record it in