Re: [PATCH] Correction to git-p4 "exclude" change

2015-02-05 Thread Junio C Hamano
Luke Diamand writes: > (Resending as plain text). > > I could be wrong about this, but my correction above doesn't seem to > be in 'next'. Does that mean (reading your last "what's cooking") that > the broken version is going to go out to 'master' soon? The current copy of "What's cooking" I hav

Re: [PATCH] Correction to git-p4 "exclude" change

2015-02-05 Thread Luke Diamand
(Resending as plain text). I could be wrong about this, but my correction above doesn't seem to be in 'next'. Does that mean (reading your last "what's cooking") that the broken version is going to go out to 'master' soon? Thanks, Luke On 5 February 2015 at 08:19, Luke Diamand wrote: > I could

Re: [PATCH] Correction to git-p4 "exclude" change

2015-01-28 Thread Junio C Hamano
Luke Diamand writes: > My previous change for adding support for "exclude" to git-p4 "sync" > was incorrect, missing out a comma, which stopped git-p4 from working. > This change fixes that. > > I've also noticed that t9814-git-p4-rename.sh has stopped working; I'm > going to follow up with a fix

[PATCH] Correction to git-p4 "exclude" change

2015-01-27 Thread Luke Diamand
My previous change for adding support for "exclude" to git-p4 "sync" was incorrect, missing out a comma, which stopped git-p4 from working. This change fixes that. I've also noticed that t9814-git-p4-rename.sh has stopped working; I'm going to follow up with a fix for that once I've worked out wha