Re: [PATCH] Change git-branch to list branches

Kalle Valo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Junio C Hamano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I do not think we have agreed to limit ourselves to a flat >> namespace under refs/heads without subdirectories. Something >> like what git-show-branches-script does when $# == 0, perhaps? > > I didn't realis

Re: [PATCH] Change git-branch to list branches

Junio C Hamano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I do not think we have agreed to limit ourselves to a flat > namespace under refs/heads without subdirectories. Something > like what git-show-branches-script does when $# == 0, perhaps? I didn't realise this. I'll send a revised patch soon. -- Kall

Re: [PATCH] Change git-branch to list branches

Kalle Valo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If no argument provided to `git branch`, show available branches and > mark current branch with star. I like the general direction, but this particular implementation may be a bit troublesome. > +if [ -z "$branchname" ]; then > +current=$(basename $(r

[PATCH] Change git-branch to list branches

If no argument provided to `git branch`, show available branches and mark current branch with star. This is based on patch written by Amos Waterland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- git-branch-script |8 +++- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 dele