Re: [PATCH] Additional git-archive tests

2013-12-10 Thread Junio C Hamano
Nick Townsend writes: >> In other words, are all these new tests expected to pass? > > Sorry about that - the first four tests do pass with 1.8.5, the last > three tests do not currently pass. OK. >> So I do not think it is expected to accept tree object names with >> the HEAD: style syntax, if

Re: [PATCH] Additional git-archive tests

2013-12-09 Thread Nick Townsend
On 5 Dec 2013, at 11:52, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Nick Townsend writes: > >> Interplay between paths specified in three ways now tested: >> * After a : in the tree-ish, >> * As a pathspec in the command, >> * By virtue of the current working directory >> >> Note that these tests are based on t

Re: [PATCH] Additional git-archive tests

2013-12-05 Thread Junio C Hamano
Nick Townsend writes: > Interplay between paths specified in three ways now tested: > * After a : in the tree-ish, > * As a pathspec in the command, > * By virtue of the current working directory > > Note that these tests are based on the behaviours > as found in 1.8.5. They may not be intentiona

[PATCH] Additional git-archive tests

2013-12-04 Thread Nick Townsend
Interplay between paths specified in three ways now tested: * After a : in the tree-ish, * As a pathspec in the command, * By virtue of the current working directory Note that these tests are based on the behaviours as found in 1.8.5. They may not be intentional. They were developed to regression