Re: [PATCH] Add very verbose porcelain output to status

2016-07-13 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi Jeff, [please note that top-posting is discouraged on this mailing list] On Tue, 12 Jul 2016, Jeff Hostetler wrote: > Thanks for the feedback. I like the overall direction of your > suggestions. Going for a porcelain V2 feels better than piling > onto verbose. I think that would also give

Re: [PATCH] Add very verbose porcelain output to status

2016-07-12 Thread Jeff Hostetler
Thanks for the feedback. I like the overall direction of your suggestions. Going for a porcelain V2 feels better than piling onto verbose. I think that would also give us a little more license to address some of the line format issues that you point out. Let me retool what I have along these l

Re: [PATCH] Add very verbose porcelain output to status

2016-07-12 Thread Jeff King
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 03:26:28PM -0400, Jeff Hostetler wrote: > Tools interacting with Git repositories may need to know the complete > state of the working directory. For efficiency, it would be good to have > a single command to obtain this information. > > We already have a `--porcelain` mod

Re: [PATCH] Add very verbose porcelain output to status

2016-07-07 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Thu, 7 Jul 2016, Jeff Hostetler wrote: > Tools interacting with Git repositories may need to know the complete > state of the working directory. For efficiency, it would be good to have > a single command to obtain this information. > > We already have a `--porcelain` mode intended for to

[PATCH] Add very verbose porcelain output to status

2016-07-07 Thread Jeff Hostetler
Tools interacting with Git repositories may need to know the complete state of the working directory. For efficiency, it would be good to have a single command to obtain this information. We already have a `--porcelain` mode intended for tools' consumption, and it only makes sense to enhance this