On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 11:28 AM Duy Nguyen wrote:
> Haven't really worked on killing the term "detached HEAD" yet. But I
> noticed the other day that git-branch reports
>
> * (HEAD detached from 703266f6e4)
>
> and I didn't know how to rephrase that. I guess "unnamed branch from
> 703266f6e4" is p
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 7:31 PM Elijah Newren wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 10:22 AM Duy Nguyen wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 6:45 PM Elijah Newren wrote:
> > > > > > - Two more fancy features (the "git checkout --index" being the
> > > > > > default mode and the backup log for acci
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 10:22 AM Duy Nguyen wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 6:45 PM Elijah Newren wrote:
> > > > > - Two more fancy features (the "git checkout --index" being the
> > > > > default mode and the backup log for accidental overwrites) are of
> > > > > course still missing. But t
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 6:45 PM Elijah Newren wrote:
> > > > - Two more fancy features (the "git checkout --index" being the
> > > > default mode and the backup log for accidental overwrites) are of
> > > > course still missing. But they are coming.
> > > >
> > > > I did not go replace "detache
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 8:28 AM Duy Nguyen wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 2:29 AM Elijah Newren wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 2:01 PM Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > v3 sees switch-branch go back to switch-branch (in v2 it was
> > > checkout-branch). checkout-files is als
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 2:29 AM Elijah Newren wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 2:01 PM Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
> wrote:
> >
> > v3 sees switch-branch go back to switch-branch (in v2 it was
> > checkout-branch). checkout-files is also renamed restore-files (v1 was
> > restore-paths). Hopefully we w
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 2:01 PM Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
>
> v3 sees switch-branch go back to switch-branch (in v2 it was
> checkout-branch). checkout-files is also renamed restore-files (v1 was
> restore-paths). Hopefully we won't see another rename.
I started reading through the patches. I
Thomas Gummerer writes:
> Agreed, I think --{no-,}overlay is a much better name for the option,
> I'll use that for my patch series (I hope to send that soon after 2.20
> is released).
OK.
> I must admit that I was not aware that the mode is called overlay
> mode, before you explained it to me,
On 11/30, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> I am unsure about the wisdom of calling it "--index", though.
>
> The "--index" option is "the command can work only on the index, or
> only on the working tree files, or on both the index and the working
> tree files, and this option tells it to work in the 'b
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 12:29 PM Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 30 2018, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 12:05 AM Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
> > wrote:
> >> Assuming greenfield development (which we definitely don't have), I
> >> don't like the "restore-files" name,
On Fri, Nov 30 2018, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 12:05 AM Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
> wrote:
>> Assuming greenfield development (which we definitely don't have), I
>> don't like the "restore-files" name, but the alternative that makes
>> sense is "checkout". Then this "--from" arg
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 1:16 AM Dan Fabulich wrote:
>
> Other thoughts on a global UI rethink:
>
> One of the most common complaints I hear about git is the conceptual
> difficulty required in undoing changes. https://ohshitgit.com/
>
> > Git is hard: screwing up is easy, and figuring out how to
Duy Nguyen writes:
> core.uiVersion is a big no no to me. I don't want to go to someone's
> terminal, type something and have a total surprise because they set
> different ui version. If you want a total UI redesign, go with a new
> prefix, like "ng" (for new git) or something instead of "git".
Duy Nguyen writes:
>>
>> OK. Is "auto-vivify the named branch based on a remote-tracking"
>> also rejected, as it is a confusing behaviour that is a too subtle
>> and implicit, just like the detaching head is, and require --guess
>> or sticking to 'git checkout'? I think it should.
>
> This tou
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 3:16 AM Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy writes:
>
> > 'git switch-branch'
> >
> > - implicit detaching is rejected. If you need to detach, you need to
> > give --detach. Or stick to 'git checkout'.
>
> OK. Is "auto-vivify the named branch based on a remo
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 12:05 AM Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
wrote:
> Assuming greenfield development (which we definitely don't have), I
> don't like the "restore-files" name, but the alternative that makes
> sense is "checkout". Then this "--from" argument could become "git
> checkout-tree -- ", an
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy writes:
> 'git switch-branch'
>
> - implicit detaching is rejected. If you need to detach, you need to
> give --detach. Or stick to 'git checkout'.
OK. Is "auto-vivify the named branch based on a remote-tracking"
also rejected, as it is a confusing behaviour that is a to
Other thoughts on a global UI rethink:
One of the most common complaints I hear about git is the conceptual difficulty
required in undoing changes. https://ohshitgit.com/
> Git is hard: screwing up is easy, and figuring out how to fix your mistakes
> is fucking impossible. Git documentation has
Assuming the great day has come to think about this, one thing I'd love to do
is to unify the name of the index/stage/cache in command-line parameters and
the documentation.
The index/stage/cache should have one canonical name, and the documentation
should support that consistently. My taste is
On Thu, Nov 29 2018, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29 2018, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
>
>> v3 sees switch-branch go back to switch-branch (in v2 it was
>> checkout-branch). checkout-files is also renamed restore-files (v1 was
>> restore-paths). Hopefully we won't see another ren
On Thu, Nov 29 2018, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
> v3 sees switch-branch go back to switch-branch (in v2 it was
> checkout-branch). checkout-files is also renamed restore-files (v1 was
> restore-paths). Hopefully we won't see another rename.
>
> I'll try to summarize the differences between the
v3 sees switch-branch go back to switch-branch (in v2 it was
checkout-branch). checkout-files is also renamed restore-files (v1 was
restore-paths). Hopefully we won't see another rename.
I'll try to summarize the differences between the new commands and
'git checkout' down here, but you're welcome
22 matches
Mail list logo
