On 22/01/2019 07:23, Jeff King wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 01:41:08AM +, Ramsay Jones wrote:
>
>> I don't do this "from time to time", but *every* build on all
>> platforms! :-D
>>
>> As I have mentioned before, I run the script on 'master', 'next'
>> and 'pu', but I don't look at the
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 01:41:08AM +, Ramsay Jones wrote:
> I don't do this "from time to time", but *every* build on all
> platforms! :-D
>
> As I have mentioned before, I run the script on 'master', 'next'
> and 'pu', but I don't look at the results for 'master', I simply
> look at the diff
On 17/01/2019 21:24, Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:13:12PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>>> @@ -966,7 +968,9 @@ int verify_path(const char *path, unsigned mode)
>>> if (is_hfs_dotgit(path))
>>> return 0;
>>>
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:13:12PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > @@ -966,7 +968,9 @@ int verify_path(const char *path, unsigned mode)
> > if (is_hfs_dotgit(path))
> > return 0;
> > if (S_ISLNK(mode)) {
>
Jeff King writes:
> Hmm. I think this commit message isn't quite right, because we also
> skipped the patches to touch gitignore/gitattributes in verify_path().
>
> Are you thinking we should resurrect that behavior[1], too, or just
> protect at the fsck level?
>
>> It was omitted from that serie
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 03:09:02PM -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> From: Jeff King
> Date: Sun, 13 May 2018 14:14:34 -0400
>
> This case is already forbidden by verify_path(), so let's
> check it in fsck. It's easier to handle than .gitmodules,
> because we don't care about checking the blob con
From: Jeff King
Date: Sun, 13 May 2018 14:14:34 -0400
This case is already forbidden by verify_path(), so let's
check it in fsck. It's easier to handle than .gitmodules,
because we don't care about checking the blob content. This
is really just about whether the name and mode for the tree
entry a
7 matches
Mail list logo
