On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Prathamesh Chavan wrote:
> Firstly, thanks for reviewing my patches. I have even checked out the
> other reviews
> and improvised the other patches according to reviews as well.
> I had a few doubts about this one though.
>
>>> + const struct submodule *sub;
Firstly, thanks for reviewing my patches. I have even checked out the
other reviews
and improvised the other patches according to reviews as well.
I had a few doubts about this one though.
>> + const struct submodule *sub;
>> + char *sub_key, *remote_key;
>> + char *sub_origin_ur
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Prathamesh Chavan wrote:
> Port the submodule subcommand 'sync' from shell to C using the same
> mechanism as that used for porting submodule subcommand 'status'.
> Hence, here the function cmd_sync() is ported from shell to C.
> This is done by introducing three f
Port the submodule subcommand 'sync' from shell to C using the same
mechanism as that used for porting submodule subcommand 'status'.
Hence, here the function cmd_sync() is ported from shell to C.
This is done by introducing three functions: module_sync(),
sync_submodule() and print_default_remote(
On 07/11, Prathamesh Chavan wrote:
> Port the submodule subcommand 'sync' from shell to C using the same
> mechanism as that used for porting submodule subcommand 'status'.
> Hence, here the function cmd_sync() is ported from shell to C.
> This is done by introducing three functions: module_sync(),
Port the submodule subcommand 'sync' from shell to C using the same
mechanism as that used for porting submodule subcommand 'status'.
Hence, here the function cmd_sync() is ported from shell to C.
This is done by introducing three functions: module_sync(),
sync_submodule() and print_default_remote(
6 matches
Mail list logo