On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Zlatko Calusic wrote:
>
> I see this -avz incantation mentioned everytime when rsync is
> involved. But, is the -z part (compression) really necessary knowing
> that we're dealing with an already compressed tree? Doesn't it put
> additional strain on the rsync server without
Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Real merges have no patches taking place _anywhere_. And they take about
> half a second. Doing an "update" of your tree should _literally_ boil down
> to
>
> #
> # "repo" needs to point to the repo we update from
> #
> rsync -
On Tue, 2005-04-19 15:43:54 -0700, Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
> >
> > Correct me if I am wrong, but the right way to do this is to set the
> > hostname to just that - the hostname, and add 'domain foo.com'
> > to /etc/resolv.conf.
>
>
On Tuesday 19 April 2005 05:38 pm, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Steven Cole wrote:
> >
> > I wasn't complaining about the 4 minutes, just the lack of feedback
> > during the majority of that time. And most of it was after the last
> > patching file message.
>
> That should be
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Steven Cole wrote:
>
> I wasn't complaining about the 4 minutes, just the lack of feedback
> during the majority of that time. And most of it was after the last
> patching file message.
That should be exactly the thing that the new "read-tree -m" fixes.
Before, when you r
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 01:04:48AM CEST, I got a letter
where Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> Then, the flurry of patching file blah messages, followed by a rather
> pregnant pause after the last patching message.
>
> I wasn't complaining about the 4 minutes, just th
On Tuesday 19 April 2005 04:38 pm, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Steven Cole wrote:
> >
> > But perhaps a progress bar right about here might be
> > a good thing for the terminally impatient.
> >
> > real3m54.909s
> > user0m14.835s
> > sys 0m10.587s
> >
> > 4 minutes
On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 15:43 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
> >
> > Correct me if I am wrong, but the right way to do this is to set the
> > hostname to just that - the hostname, and add 'domain foo.com'
> > to /etc/resolv.conf.
>
> I'll correct you
Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 06:27:38PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 03:00:04PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Greg KH wrote:
It looks like your domain name isn't set up properly for your box (which
is why it worked for you, but not me before,
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 12:38:17AM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> Just say no to patches.
FYI, I've - per Junio's suggestion - made git merge's fast-forward to
apply show-diff output as a patch instead. This is roughly equal to
doing th
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 12:45:02AM CEST, I got a letter
where Junio C Hamano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> > "PB" == Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> PB> I'm wondering if doing
>
> PB> if [ "$(show-diff)" ]; then
> PB> git diff | git apply
> PB> else
> PB> c
Hi all!
Quoting Linus Torvalds ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> And even the ones that use domainname tend to not have a fully qualified
> DNS domain there. You need to use dnsdomainname to get that, and I don't
> even know how to do it with standard libc.
I don't think getdomainname should be used at a
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
>
> I will probably not buy git-export, though. (That is, it is merged, but
> I won't make git frontend for it.) My "git export" already does
> something different, but more importantly, "git patch" of mine already
> does effectively the same thing as you
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>
> Easiest might be to punt to hostname --fqdn, or an equivalent to its
> algorithm - which appears to be fetch the hostname from uname, do a DNS
> lookup on that, and a reverse DNS lookup on the result.
Hah. I'll just commit my patch, and for any
> "PB" == Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
PB> I'm wondering if doing
PB> if [ "$(show-diff)" ]; then
PB> git diff | git apply
PB> else
PB> checkout-cache -f -a
PB> fi
PB> would actually buy us some time; or, how common is it for people to have
PB> no local changes whatsoever,
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
>
> Correct me if I am wrong, but the right way to do this is to set the
> hostname to just that - the hostname, and add 'domain foo.com'
> to /etc/resolv.conf.
I'll correct you.
The fact is, that's not what people do. Not me, not kernel.org, not _
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 10:20:47PM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> Pasky? Can you check my latest git stuff, notably read-tree.c and the
> changes to git-pull-script?
I've made git merge to use read-tree -m, HTH.
I will probably not buy
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Steven Cole wrote:
>
> But perhaps a progress bar right about here might be
> a good thing for the terminally impatient.
>
> real3m54.909s
> user0m14.835s
> sys 0m10.587s
>
> 4 minutes might be long enough to cause some folks to lose hope.
Well, the real operat
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 06:27:38PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 03:00:04PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Greg KH wrote:
> > >
> > > It looks like your domain name isn't set up properly for your box (which
> > > is why it worked for you
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 03:00:04PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > It looks like your domain name isn't set up properly for your box (which
> > is why it worked for you, but not me before, causing that patch).
>
> No, I think it's a bug in your dom
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 12:19:01AM CEST, I got a letter
where Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> >On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Greg KH wrote:
> >
> >>Nice, it looks like the merge of this tree, and my usb tree worked just
> >>fine.
> >
> >
> >Yup, it a
On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 15:00 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > It looks like your domain name isn't set up properly for your box (which
> > is why it worked for you, but not me before, causing that patch).
>
> No, I think it's a bug in your domainname ch
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Greg KH wrote:
Nice, it looks like the merge of this tree, and my usb tree worked just
fine.
Yup, it all seems to work out.
[many files patched]
patching file mm/mmap.c
patching file net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c
patching file scripts/ver_linux
---
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Greg KH wrote:
>
> It looks like your domain name isn't set up properly for your box (which
> is why it worked for you, but not me before, causing that patch).
No, I think it's a bug in your domainname changes. I don't think you
should do the domainname at all if the hostna
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 01:20:47PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > Ok, if you want some practice with "real" merges, feel free to merge from
> > the following two trees whenever you are ready:
> > kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/aoe-2
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Greg KH wrote:
>
> Ok, if you want some practice with "real" merges, feel free to merge from
> the following two trees whenever you are ready:
> kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/aoe-2.6.git/
> for 11 aoe bugfix patches, and:
> kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/k
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 12:40:44PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I'm still working out some performance issues with merges (the actual
> "merge" operation itself is very fast, but I've been trying to make the
> subsequent "update the working directory tree to the right thing" be much
> better).
O
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Greg KH wrote:
>
> Nice, it looks like the merge of this tree, and my usb tree worked just
> fine.
Yup, it all seems to work out.
> So, what does this now mean? Is your kernel.org git tree now going to
> be the "real" kernel tree that you will be working off of now? Shou
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 09:39:38PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> Alright, let's try some small i2c and w1 patches...
>
> Could you merge with:
> kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/i2c-2.6.git/
Nice, it looks like the merge of this tree, and my usb tree worked just
fine.
So, what does thi
Alright, let's try some small i2c and w1 patches...
Could you merge with:
kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/i2c-2.6.git/
It contains 4 small patches, 2 i2c and 2 w1 bugfixes, diffstat is
below, I'll figure out how to send the individual patches later.
thanks,
greg k-h
drivers
30 matches
Mail list logo
