On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 04:50:34PM +, Eric Wong wrote:
> > Weird. I had set http.maxrequests to "1" to give more readable output
> > from GIT_CURL_VERBOSE, etc. It fails with that setting, but not with the
> > default of 5. Which certainly seems like a bug, but one that has been
> > there for
Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> Yes, git HEAD + said patch works with this command:
> git -c http.followRedirects=true clone http://git.denx.de/u-boot-efi.git
>
> http.followRedirects is documented in man 1 git-config.
>
> Why would git prior to 17966c0a63d25b1cc2dd1e98d30873e643bd581f~1 work
> wi
On 3/22/19 7:09 PM, Eric Wong wrote:
> Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>> On 3/22/19 5:50 PM, Eric Wong wrote:
>>> I couldn't reproduce an error after porting your patch to
>>> master (commit 041f5ea1cf987a40 "The third batch"):
>>> https://80x24.org/spew/20190322163449.25362-...@80x24.org/raw
>>>
>>>
Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 3/22/19 5:50 PM, Eric Wong wrote:
> > I couldn't reproduce an error after porting your patch to
> > master (commit 041f5ea1cf987a40 "The third batch"):
> > https://80x24.org/spew/20190322163449.25362-...@80x24.org/raw
> >
> > So you might've hit an ephemeral error (
On 3/22/19 5:50 PM, Eric Wong wrote:
> Jeff King wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 09:21:14AM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Jeff,
>>>
>>> In message <20190322071231.ga26...@sigill.intra.peff.net> you wrote:
However, so does the parent of 17966c0a63d. So I don't know if the
Jeff King wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 09:21:14AM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>
> > Dear Jeff,
> >
> > In message <20190322071231.ga26...@sigill.intra.peff.net> you wrote:
> > >
> > > However, so does the parent of 17966c0a63d. So I don't know if the
> > > u-boot-efi repo is just broken, or
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 09:21:14AM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Jeff,
>
> In message <20190322071231.ga26...@sigill.intra.peff.net> you wrote:
> >
> > However, so does the parent of 17966c0a63d. So I don't know if the
> > u-boot-efi repo is just broken, or if there's some other different bu
Dear Jeff,
In message <20190322071231.ga26...@sigill.intra.peff.net> you wrote:
>
> However, so does the parent of 17966c0a63d. So I don't know if the
> u-boot-efi repo is just broken, or if there's some other different bug
> at play.
git fsck reports a number of dangling tags, but no other issue
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 07:02:41AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> Initial cloning via
>
> git clone http://git.denx.de/u-boot-efi.git
>
> fails with git version 2.21.0.196.g041f5ea1cf
>
> git version 2.1.4 works fine.
>
> Bisection points to this first bad commit:
> 17966c0a63d25b1cc2
Initial cloning via
git clone http://git.denx.de/u-boot-efi.git
fails with git version 2.21.0.196.g041f5ea1cf
git version 2.1.4 works fine.
Bisection points to this first bad commit:
17966c0a63d25b1cc2dd1e98d30873e643bd581f
http: avoid disconnecting on 404s for loose objects
Please, fix th
10 matches
Mail list logo