Marat Radchenko writes:
>> > * You must not do 'inverted merges'. Old HEAD must be reachable from
>> > new HEAD by first-parent traversal.
>>
>> I am not sure what you mean by this to properly assess how
>> significant this limitation is. Care to draw a simple picture?
>
> SVN doesn't sup
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 09:49:03AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Marat Radchenko writes:
>
> > Some time ago I complained [1] about troubles using Git
> > on a project with high ratio of non-programmers.
> > ...
> > Then, a lost'n'forgotten git_svn_server [4] was found.
> > ...
>
> Interesting.
Marat Radchenko writes:
> Some time ago I complained [1] about troubles using Git
> on a project with high ratio of non-programmers.
> ...
> Then, a lost'n'forgotten git_svn_server [4] was found.
> ...
Interesting.
> Current limitations:
> ...
> * You must not do 'inverted merges'. Old HEAD m
Some time ago I complained [1] about troubles using Git
on a project with high ratio of non-programmers.
Since then, a conclusion was made: Git is too complex.
While Git provides many nice advanced stuff, its simplest
workflow isn't simple enough.
So we examined other options:
* Splitting proj
4 matches
Mail list logo