On 25 September 2013 22:01, Matthieu Moy wrote:
> Jona Christopher Sahnwaldt writes:
>
>> Yes, I think the rules for the "short form" (the guessing when there's
>> no --) should be made simpler, or maybe the guessing should be dropped
>> altogether. I don't know. I don't know git well enough to b
Jona Christopher Sahnwaldt writes:
> Yes, I think the rules for the "short form" (the guessing when there's
> no --) should be made simpler, or maybe the guessing should be dropped
> altogether. I don't know. I don't know git well enough to be able to
> be more specific. I just find the current b
On 25 September 2013 21:12, Matthieu Moy wrote:
> Jona Christopher Sahnwaldt writes:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> tl;dr: The short form "git checkout foo" is a mess. There's simply too
>> much "DWIM" magic going on. There are no comprehensible rules how it
>> decides if "foo" is a pathspec or a refspe
Jona Christopher Sahnwaldt writes:
> Hi everyone,
>
> tl;dr: The short form "git checkout foo" is a mess. There's simply too
> much "DWIM" magic going on. There are no comprehensible rules how it
> decides if "foo" is a pathspec or a refspec.
There is a very simple rule:
What's on the left hand
Hi everyone,
tl;dr: The short form "git checkout foo" is a mess. There's simply too
much "DWIM" magic going on. There are no comprehensible rules how it
decides if "foo" is a pathspec or a refspec.
On 25 September 2013 15:09, Matthieu Moy wrote:
> Jona Christopher Sahnwaldt writes:
>
>> On 25
Jona Christopher Sahnwaldt writes:
> On 25 September 2013 04:51, David Aguilar wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Jona Christopher Sahnwaldt
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> maybe this has already been reported, but I didn't find it in the mail
>>> archive.
>>>
>>> If I understand correctly,
On 25 September 2013 04:51, David Aguilar wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Jona Christopher Sahnwaldt
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> maybe this has already been reported, but I didn't find it in the mail
>> archive.
>>
>> If I understand correctly, after I clone a repo, I should be able to
>> sw
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Keshav Kini wrote:
> [2] fs@erdos /tmp/extraction-framework $ git checkout wiktionary --
> fatal: invalid reference: wiktionary
It may work if we demote this from fatal to error warning so the dwim
logic in checkout has a chance to try differently, I thin
David Aguilar writes:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Jona Christopher Sahnwaldt
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> maybe this has already been reported, but I didn't find it in the mail
>> archive.
>>
>> If I understand correctly, after I clone a repo, I should be able to
>> switch to branch foo just by
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Jona Christopher Sahnwaldt
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> maybe this has already been reported, but I didn't find it in the mail
> archive.
>
> If I understand correctly, after I clone a repo, I should be able to
> switch to branch foo just by running
>
> git checkout foo
>
> T
Hi,
maybe this has already been reported, but I didn't find it in the mail archive.
If I understand correctly, after I clone a repo, I should be able to
switch to branch foo just by running
git checkout foo
This doesn't seem to work if a folder called "foo" exists in the root
of the repo.
I go
11 matches
Mail list logo